Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
“We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain .” - Benjamin Franklin So flat Earthers, man-made climate change deniers, and just science deniers.
I friended myself!
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 78%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.04  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 17%  
  Learn More About Debra
“We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain .” - Benjamin Franklin So flat Earthers, man-made climate change deniers, and just science deniers.
I friended myself!
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 59%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.22  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 80%  
  Learn More About Debra
That's it?
I gave you an equally, if not more plausible explanation for "polar opposites" and that is your respone?
In the far north, what is known as midnight sun is experienced in it's summer months where the sun doesn't go down.
This should happen in the south too. Meaning that the "continent" should be substantially higher in average tempurature. It actually probably doesn't, further proving the flat model to be the most correct.
I could swear that I clarified myself on this, maybe I'll copy and paste it?(sarc) Plateau.
"There are points on Antartica much lower than that. That is the most."
Oh I haven't claimed that "the wall" goes all the way around as a sheer cliff, it being above sea level is enough to contain the earth's waters.
"No, the temperature on Antartica is too cold."
For... Plant life? If you're going to include incomplete sentences, at least include my quote so that I know what your are referring to.
"No, it is not the case. There are more choices and you just denied because of reasons. It does prove it. It is too cold for plants to survive. So, it would have to be closer to the equator (where it is hotter) at one point in time. "
This is precisely what i explained, except with my model. The "equator", in my model, is the average path of the sun's circuit. Your "poles" are the places where the sun does not melt, further away from it's circuit. You're describing (I think) the Pangea theory. I am claiming that the "equator" has changed, possibly after the flood, and the earth has gotten smaller.
http://truthrising.net/flat-earth-1000-year-old-buddhist-map/
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pangaea
"If you it was how the oceans are kept in place then it should not have it because it would not be able to move. No plants have been discovered there. Your star can't be the reason because I've debunked it before."
...What? I'm genuinely trying to understand you, but it's like you're speaking your own language sometimes.
Scientific method: noun; a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.
The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about.
Wayne Dyer
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.88  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 55%  
  Learn More About Debra
@someone234
Scientific method: noun; a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.
The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about.
Wayne Dyer
  Considerate: 76%  
  Substantial: 35%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.8  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 6%  
  Learn More About Debra
Scientific method: noun; a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.
The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about.
Wayne Dyer
  Considerate: 76%  
  Substantial: 78%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.16  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 17%  
  Learn More About Debra
Scientific method: noun; a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.
The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about.
Wayne Dyer
  Considerate: 54%  
  Substantial: 54%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
Scientific method: noun; a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.
The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about.
Wayne Dyer
  Considerate: 91%  
  Substantial: 38%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.22  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 91%  
  Learn More About Debra
This is for @someone234 also
Wow Pogue I have not seen so much misinformation since we started the FE debates. It's not even worth debunking.
I will ask you only one question, which I already KNOW that you will not answer in laymans terms, but will try to use sci-fi rhetoric, but heck, here it goes anyways:
With the Globe-Earth you cannot have a Creator God. I don't mean the millions of created gods, but the Only Infinite and Eternal God possible: "I Am", so you are stuck with the next best explanation of the Heaven and the Earth; BB-Evolution.
OK, so let's start with the Big Bang which you know was invented by a Catholic Jesuit Priest, similar to a Jesuit Priest who wrote the Satanic Bible in one sitting.
OK, here is your Universe down at a singularity, .. it is getting denser and hotter, ..
Q. What medium are you, or any Big Bang scientist imagining this event taking place "in"?
  Considerate: 94%  
  Substantial: 75%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.16  
  Sources: 31  
  Relevant (Beta): 4%  
  Learn More About Debra
@someone234 it's against his religion.
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 72%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.28  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 75%  
  Learn More About Debra
Scientific method: noun; a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.
The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about.
Wayne Dyer
  Considerate: 94%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.14  
  Sources: 31  
  Relevant (Beta): 4%  
  Learn More About Debra
Scientific method: noun; a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.
The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about.
Wayne Dyer
  Considerate: 94%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.14  
  Sources: 31  
  Relevant (Beta): 4%  
  Learn More About Debra
Oh, I see, thanks @Erfisflat.
So is there any other Big-bangers here who could defend their stories?
You know, .. I have been kicked off half a dozen Forums, both Christian and Atheist for asking these two simple questions, as the one above on the BB, .. and on the evolution theory, about the taxonomy of this mysterious creature they call "Common Ancestor" that can split into two or more branches of different species, yet itself is never identified.
I would love to ask these same questions, in public, both from Dawkins, and his "Origins Project" buddy Lawrence Krauss!?
  Considerate: 94%  
  Substantial: 76%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.32  
  Sources: 29  
  Relevant (Beta): 6%  
  Learn More About Debra
The Big bang is a theory.
Gods are theories.
Flat Earth is a theory.
No one knows the answer.
We are all making assumptions.
  Considerate: 94%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.54  
  Sources: 30  
  Relevant (Beta): 6%  
  Learn More About Debra
Scientific method: noun; a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.
The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about.
Wayne Dyer
  Considerate: 94%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.52  
  Sources: 30  
  Relevant (Beta): 4%  
  Learn More About Debra
Yes, gods are theories, and Infinite God "Is", .. as in "I Am".
What is a scientific theory?
A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment. Such fact-supported theories are not "guesses" but reliable accounts of the real world.
1. a body of facts.
2. that have been reputedly confirmed through
3. observation, and experiment
4. NOT guesses
let's take air for an example, what is air?
air is the invisible gaseous substance above the flat earth, a mixture mainly of oxygen and nitrogen based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment.
So what is a singularity?
Singularity - http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/blogs/physics/2015/12/are-singularities-real/
It’s hard to imagine infinity: something that is, by definition, larger than everything you can imagine.
Physicists have to deal with the unimaginable every day, and have the tools to do so.
But does their math describe reality?
Ah, nothing like starting off a scientific theory on a false definition like changing Infinite into infinity, then make up another theory like the one that physicists don’t know how to resolve, like the one that appears in Einstein’s theory of General Relativity when matter collapses under the gravitational pull of its own weight, .. lol
Yep, .. physicists observe matter collapsing under the gravitational pull of its own weight all the time, like watching a 500lb. person walk up 10 steps, .. pant, .. pant, .. pant .. sigh, .. collapse, .. gravity keeps pressing on the fat person till you have, ... drum roll, .. a gravitational singularity!
Here is an example of infinity, you can start with numbers like; 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, .. now is that "larger than anything you can imagine"? Two year olds can count to 5 and then stop, is that large counting to 5? Even I can do that on one hand!
How can anyone get a degree in physics and not understand the difference between infinity and Infinite?
Infinite has no boarders, but infinity is literally made up of boarders, like;
.. boarder 1 boarder 2 boarder 3 boarder 4 boarder .. and so on.
The Flat Earth is a theory? Look how many people have checked it including every one of us here, everything from lasers, telescopes, levels, sound/radio waves just about every tool we use to check for level, there is no curvature over water except when we hit an island, .. which we can see from over 60 miles away.
Yes, BB-Evolution and all their claims are assumptions, Infinite God and His creation are real, that can be observed by "real science".
  Considerate: 85%  
  Substantial: 76%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.16  
  Sources: 9  
  Relevant (Beta): 17%  
  Learn More About Debra
1) How can anyone get a degree if they do not know the difference between a boarder and a border.
2) Infinity is the state or quality of being infinite.
3) Infinity is an immeasurable reality and therefore cannot be regarded as being "large".
4) The flat Earth is an outdated theory. Superseded many hundreds of years ago, by the spherical Earth theory.
5) "God and his creation are real". This is an archaic theory, that some people have been conditioned to accept as fact.
6) Maybe a God initiated the Big Bang. But what initiated the God?
7) It's no good whatsoever to simply say God is infinite, as this is just a glib statement that cannot be substantiated.
  Considerate: 86%  
  Substantial: 64%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.54  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 91%  
  Learn More About Debra
@Fredsnephew
1) How can anyone get a degree if they do not know the difference between a boarder and a border.
Cantors Infinite has boarders, and right now they're all in the "playroom", .. OK?
The upper attic
2) Infinity is the state or quality of being infinite.
There is no state to Infinite because there is no 'matter' or any 'properties' to Infinite. You are describing 'infinity', not Infinite. Infinity cannot ever become, or describe Infinite. That would be, .. umm, .. like describing a clean canvas by putting more and more painting on it.
3) Infinity is an immeasurable reality and therefore cannot be regarded as being "large".
Sorry but that's wrong, .. actually infinity is the one that can be measured, all the way on to infinity, and any part of it too, anywhere from the beginning on. It can be large, high, many, etc. and can go in all different directions too. But not Infinite, because Infinite 'Is' the "ground of Being". So Infinites state is actually "consciousness", .. yes, .. I like that:
The state of Infinite is consciousness, yet is not a being, but the Ground of Being.
Can you "see/know/acknowledge" Him now?
4) The flat Earth is an outdated theory. Superseded many hundreds of years ago, by the spherical Earth theory.
How about this: "The flat Earth is an outdated reality. Superseded many hundreds of years ago, by pseudoscience and their spherical Earth theory."
5) "God and his creation are real". This is an archaic theory, that some people have been conditioned to accept as fact.
Wow, talking about being conditioned to accept something as fact! My little niece is staying with us finishing her school year while her mom is in the Philippines visiting. After she's done with her homework, she gets on the laptop and watches YouTube "children's programming", .. and my God if it's not literal "programming" of their little minds! Every show is full of magic, planets, alien creatures, dragons, more magic, .. and oh look, globes everywhere with an occasional grunt of the word "science".
How can observable reality be an old archaic theory?
You may be right about the archaic part, it is being forgotten, replaced with todays science fiction stories, in books and movies and like I said children programming. Like taking a school bus to Mars, where NASA spends millions on such deception like their predecessors did to us with the globes in our schools, because they know that the more you repeat something (like their timetables) the more it sticks in their heads.
I actually heard adults in line for that last Star Wars movie, and they were talking about the planets, space, ships and people in the movie as if they really did live on a spinning globe themselves. I didn't realize this till now that @Erfisflat opened my eyes to another good look at earth, how I too was floating and flying with Chewbacca aboard the Millennium Falcon!
6) Maybe a God initiated the Big Bang. But what initiated the God?
Why would God initiate a singularity, then explode it with gravity, .. and keep it expanding by pumping more vacuum into it?
7) It's no good whatsoever to simply say God is infinite, as this is just a glib statement that cannot be substantiated
Infinite Is God, who created beings and other realities, realms and things, .. including the no-thing. You cant substantiate Infinite, only His creation, which by logic has to have the conscious Infinite. How could you accept an expanding universe that's being expanded by gravity and a vacuum, and not understand Infinite God??
  Considerate: 94%  
  Substantial: 74%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.86  
  Sources: 11  
  Relevant (Beta): 34%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 95%  
  Substantial: 27%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.26  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
As far as the human species is concerned. I would have to say that knowledge and intelligence are no match for common sense and logic.
  Considerate: 69%  
  Substantial: 54%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.1  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
Didn't stop all of us, there are those that can go anywhere, and having seen things, they put a stop to anyone (except them) going there.
ATS - The Antarctic Treaty - Antarctic Treaty Secretariat
Why?
Why is there a treaty to keep us from exploring Antarctica if it really is just a frozen wasteland?
  Considerate: 95%  
  Substantial: 87%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.06  
  Sources: 5  
  Relevant (Beta): 77%  
  Learn More About Debra
Look, .. what if you put globes into all the schools, .. enforce the media to often mention: "News from NASA!", .. science education, books, create conspiracy stories of aliens from vacuum space and alien abduction on one hand, .. then refute it on the other, as long as the topic of the general public is on BB-globe-earth.
Build multimillion dollar busses and take children on "trips to Mars", .. put out 10+ sci-fi movies a month world wide to keep the topic on globe earth, then teach children to ridicule and make fun of and call anyone that stands up to observed and proven-reality "Conspiracy nuts" .. and label "space, globe earth, gravity, black holes, the B.S. from NASA and CERN" as 'intelligence and knowledge' until It becomes "common sense".
Look at all the Flat Earth videos where they interview people, and observe their reaction, especially the snickers when we mention Flat Earth. (thank God that's finally changing, people are beginning to be educated on it!)
we can make senseless rhetoric like the Big Bang and evolution stories to sound like knowledge and intelligence. I've been to science fairs where more than half was sci-fi, with Storm Troopers and Chewbacca the Wookiee as main attractions, .. yeah, real knowledge and intelligence there, .. who needs common sense, right?
  Considerate: 76%  
  Substantial: 96%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 83%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.14  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
Look.
The flat Earth theory was conclusively disproved approximately 500 years ago. Long before N.A.S.A and the modern U.S.A. were ever thought of.
The spherical Earth theory was first proposed thousands of years ago. Long before the invention of the modern Christian God.
Thing is.
Your modern conspiracy theory is fun to debate, but is nonetheless a modern conspiracy theory, clearly based upon modern personal resentments.
As for the Big Bang and Evolution.
Well these are theoretical and still open to discussion. I do not accept either of these theories as given fact.
The Big Bang is plausible but falls down in exactly the same way as the God theory does. That is to say both theories fundamentally rely on the magical something from nothing principle.
Evolution is a more logical proposition and fits comfortably with both The Big Bang theory and the God theory.
Evolution as a developmental process relies only on the existence of matter and not on the magical event that created matter.
The difference between you and I is.
I will not accept without proof. Whereas you will accept with blind faith.
I do not resent other peoples achievements. Whereas you clearly do.
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 97%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.86  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 38%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.88  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 89%  
  Learn More About Debra
Scientific method: noun; a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.
The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about.
Wayne Dyer
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 61%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.88  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 89%  
  Learn More About Debra
Scientific method: noun; a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.
The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about.
Wayne Dyer
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 97%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.86  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
Actually the Ball Earth theory is outdated.
That is because the Ball Earth proposition is no longer theoretical, but a proven fact.
Unequivocally proved to be correct, over 500 years ago.
Hey.
You can keep flogging your dead horse.
As I've said before, it makes for fun debating.
What would debateisland.com be without its Flat Earth protagonists?
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 67%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.38  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 77%  
  Learn More About Debra
500 years using drawings of stars as planets, and a globe-earth similar to NASA's Blue Marble, right? Seems like nothing changed from 500 years ago, still using artist rendered images, cartoons, cave paintings of aliens in space suits and a lot of fantastic movies and sci-fi stories.
The spherical Earth theory was first proposed thousands of years ago. Long before the invention of the modern Christian God.
Nephew, the spherical earth IS the "modern Christian gods". Haven't you been keeping up with the Vatican's News announcements that the RCC Jesuit-Christian George Lemaitre was correct, and God is no longer the magician creating things out of nothing as once thought to be! The Pope announced it.
Thing is.
Your modern conspiracy theory is fun to debate, but is nonetheless a modern conspiracy theory, clearly based upon modern personal resentments.
I know first hand of those resentments, how I resented @Erfisflat claim of a Flat Earth, .. until he convinced me to take a second look.
"Just one look, .. that's all it took yeah, just one look, ..
As for the Big Bang and Evolution.
Well these are theoretical and still open to discussion. I do not accept either of these theories as given fact.
Yeah, that's what you say on a Debating sight, .. smart move, because you know you would loose trying to defend a magical universe that blew up because of gravity, in a medium "we don't know what", .. and expanding because of the vacuum. I mean what intelligent person would even try to defend an expanding gravity-vacuum theory? Only the likes of the Marshal Applewhite's of the world would do that, like Hawking, Dawkins, Krauss etc.
The Big Bang is plausible but falls down in exactly the same way as the God theory does. That is to say both theories fundamentally rely on the magical something from nothing principle.
Our Infinite Conscious Mind/God is the Ground of Reality, it can't "fall down", .. on 'what grounds' would you build reality on? Our reality starts with creation, starting with His son Word, .. NOT with God. God Is, as he told His Prophet Moses: "I Am". Now tell me which part of this Big Bang story is "plausible"?
Evolution is a more logical proposition and fits comfortably with both The Big Bang theory and the God theory.
Evolution as a developmental process relies only on the existence of matter and not on the magical event that created matter.
Of course the Evolution, the Big-Bang and plural gods theory fit comfortably, .. they were all created by the same Gentile pagan gods worshippers. Why do you think they continue their trillions of dollars Marshall Applewhite missions to land on these gods like Mars, and that new Tatooine Earth-like planets from Star Wars?
As for Evolution, the story relies on one thing, "millions and billions of years ago fairytales". Didn't you and I debated the evolution story? How Richard Dawkins and other evolutionists agree that "Evolution/Speciation Never Happens"!? To top that off, they even admit that "if evolution/speciation of one specific species were to speciate/evolve into another distinct species (like a duck turning into a crocodile), that would Prove Evolution wrong". So even Evolutionists admit that; Evolution/Speciation Never Happens, only fossils and skull & bones evolve in this wildly imaginative and fantastic story.
The difference between you and I is.
I will not accept without proof. Whereas you will accept with blind faith.
Proof, you mean like the artist rendered Blue Marble, right?
My faith (as I have said a hundred times throughout my debates) is based on the Biblical interpretation:
Hebrews 11:1 Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.
you see, my faith is based on evidence with substance, not the pagan gods worshipping interpretation of "blind-faith".I do not resent other peoples achievements. Whereas you clearly do.
Yes, I do resent the 1,700 year old RCC Christian Nazi run NASA and CERN; deception achievements over mankind, all the while exterminating us like the animals they identify us with. That's why they use monkeys and Negros, and other non-German animals for their experiments, for them, there is no difference.
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 96%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.42  
  Sources: 5  
  Relevant (Beta): 83%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 86%  
  Substantial: 73%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.78  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
I found that it's not trying to answer Globetard questions like "why does the sun set, how does it stay up, .. how do you explain this, or that?" but looking at every NASA claim, like the moon landing, or the Mars Rover landings, or that new Tatooine earth-like planet they just found, or the billions spent on our Star Wars defense, ..
Star Wars Defense - On March 23, 1983, President Ronald Reagan took to the airwaves to announce the first steps toward building an ambitious defense system that would protect America from nuclear annihilation.
Star Wars "A new hope" May 25, 1977
Star Wars "Empire strikes back" May 21, 1980
(We were now ready for the next mass MK-Ultra)
US Star Wars Defense - On March 23, 1983
The ambitious and costly program, dubbed “Star Wars,” is now in its fourth decade, having consumed $209 billion while never being tested, even on a limited scale, in the heat of battle.
So imagine taking in $209 Billion dollars on a space defense program that is no more real than that silly science fiction movie "Death Star" is!? I'm sure there is a tabletop model of it sitting somewhere on German president Steinmeier's desk, .. nest to a Moon-rock!?
The LOL- is on us evolving sub-humans.
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 73%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.82  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 60%  
  Learn More About Debra
The Strategic Defence Initiative was called the Star Wars program by the media and the public as a pet name, It was never it's actual name or what the government called it by when it introduced it, people just called it that because it was a high-tech space related thing and Star Wars was new and famous at the time..
The SDI was superseded by the Missile Defence Agency and the combined work of the two agencies is in use today and is very real, contrary to your claims. They've developed the Patrior Missile Defence system for instance which was used in both Iraq/USA Wars and is in use in Israel.
Back on mute you go.
  Considerate: 86%  
  Substantial: 64%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.32  
  Sources: 3  
  Relevant (Beta): 57%  
  Learn More About Debra
OK, so I'll speak as a mute;
"made up by the media"? .. and who controls the media!? And yes it WAS always called the Star Wars program, ask anyone?
http://www.coldwar.org/articles/80s/SDI-StarWars.asp
- "The Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), also known as Star Wars, was a program first initiated on March 23, 1983 under President Ronald Reagan."
But when spoken of, then it never was called "Star Wars", or never was called "Big-Bang theory", .. or that "Evolution never really happens", .. we can go on and on and on with the flip-flopping to avoid the topic right? Or either mute-us, and if that doesn't work, put us on mute!
Yes, of course after raking in $209 BILLION dollars, and no vacuum space to keep an imaginary Star Wars Death star laser in, .. the next best thing was created: The "Terminator" machine missile defense system, all automatic just like the 5-G Microwave Terminator program is, so when They program it to start killing Jews and Arabs (in Israel) and all of us here, they'll just invent another "axis of evil" to blame it on!
* German/Austrian Arnold Schwarzenegger in "Terminator" Oct 1984
* German/Austrian Arnold Schwarzenegger in Terminator "Judgement Day" July 3 1991
* A Patriot system of the German Air Force in August 2005. The MIM-104 Patriot is a surface-to-air missile (SAM) system, the primary of its kind used by the United States Army and several allied (soon to be Terminated) nations.
* Terminator "Salvation" the only hope for us evolving subhuman is to cut off our arms and legs, get a lobotomy, in exchange for bionics and a chip implant in our brain! It is happening as we speak, but once they trigger the "Patriot system" and blow away a few hundred million people, everyone left alive will be lining up in Germany to become the "Six million dollar bionic-man-woman-child"!
Brilliant plan, once peoples arms or legs get shot off by the Patriot Machine Defense system, or cut off for minor infections, everyone will want one!
NASA must be sooo proud of itself working on fulfilling the death of humanity and the "Rise of the Machines".
  Considerate: 76%  
  Substantial: 74%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.32  
  Sources: 14  
  Relevant (Beta): 46%  
  Learn More About Debra
People have been doing this for thousands of years. Long before evil N.A.S.A. came on the scene. (July29th 1958)
I understand the Flat Earth theory. But I also Know that the Flat Earth theory is incorrect.
Erfisflat maybe very good at producing pretty pictures and diagrams. But their theory falls down on the simplest of questions.
Let's be honest, this whole debate isn't about the reality of the universe. It's about personal resentment of those who are cleverer and more successful than ourselves. Not a grudge that I share, may I add.
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 72%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.54  
  Sources: 3  
  Relevant (Beta): 35%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 75%  
  Substantial: 38%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.5  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 57%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 66%  
  Substantial: 54%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.7  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
Hello @LukePhillips
From all the evidence so far, the Flat Earth Society is just another of NASA's long arm of deception, just like Elon Musk's SpaceX. No one can claim to go into space, or land on the moon, or Mars without the authorization of NASA, because they own the rights to this imaginary sci-fi space, and the millions, and billions and trillions of Carl Sagan planets with it.
In other words, if any country or organization wishes to do any imaginary space-travel, they have to buy the green-screen equipment, and rent the Zero-G planes, or Space-pools from NASA.
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 61%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.46  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 49%  
  Learn More About Debra
You said - You don't need N.A.S.A. to convince you of space and planets. Just take a walk outdoors on a dark evening, tilt your head backwards and open your eyes.
People have been doing this for thousands of years. Long before evil N.A.S.A. came on the scene. (July29th 1958)
When I go outside on a dark evening and tilt my head back, I see stars, and through my telescope they look like stars, right there where they were for thousands of years.
I understand the Flat Earth theory. But I also Know that the Flat Earth theory is incorrect.
Yes, NASA's Flat Earth Societies flat earth theory is incorrect, we agree.
Erfisflat maybe very good at producing pretty pictures and diagrams. But their theory falls down on the simplest of questions.
That would be NASA who produces them "pretty sci-fi pictures", what @Erfisflat shows is what's really out there.
Let's be honest, this whole debate isn't about the reality of the universe. It's about personal resentment of those who are cleverer and more successful than ourselves. Not a grudge that I share, may I add.
Yes, after starving half the world, robbing us billions and billions of dollars a month, it's about time we have some resentment of those who are cleverer and so successful in deceiving us, then robbing us blind, .. especially being so arrogant about it. Just don't take all the credit, if it wasn't for God allowing this, .. this rather poor deception to take hold of us, not even grade school children would fall for it. In other words; you're not so smart. Besides, magic tricks can only work for so long.
  Considerate: 84%  
  Substantial: 74%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.3  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 29%  
  Learn More About Debra
https://www.google.com/amp/s/flateartheducation.wordpress.com/2018/01/10/how-many-flat-earthers-are-there-part-ii-also-predictions-for-2018/amp/
So why is everyone suddenly questioning a truism that has existed for decades, or debatably "thousands of years"?
1. As @Evidence points out, what if the images we were shown of our home were NOT images of our home? When looked at with skepticism, every image of a spherical earth are proven to be faked, or composite, whatever you want to call it.
I'm not joking, investigate for yourself! Don't just take my word for it.
2. If you want to prove that flat earthers are crazy and Nasa went to the moon, GOOD LUCK! They lost the data!
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_11_missing_tapes
3. NASA says space is a vacuum, but experimental tests show that combustion and thrust are impossible in a vacuum, yes, even with an added oxidizer, as the naysayers will contest.
4." But, but, we saw the rocket go into space with our own eyes! "
What we see are rockets that go up, turn, and go back down to our beautiful flat Earth!
They say it's easier to get into space than going straight up. These amateurs show us what happens when we try to go straight up. Remember that an object in motion stays in motion unless acted upon by an outside "force".
5. "But, but, people have circumnavigated the earth for many years, proving it is a ball! "
Not so fast, east and west circumnavigation is entirely possible on our flat Earth. North and South circumnavigation, which should be possible on a spherical earth, never happened. "But it's too cold!" Mars is no problem though...
https://www.space.com/16907-what-is-the-temperature-of-mars.html
6. "But, but, muh boats go over the horizon! Aristotle saw it with the unaided eye, thousands of years ago!"
A combination of perspective and refraction causes this phenomenon, NOT impossibly curved water.
And Chicago is seen some 57 miles across lake Michigan, which should be hidden by 2,000 feet of alleged curvature.
Scientific method: noun; a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.
The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about.
Wayne Dyer
  Considerate: 85%  
  Substantial: 63%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.08  
  Sources: 14  
  Relevant (Beta): 16%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 8%  
  Substantial: 43%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.6  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 83%  
  Learn More About Debra
@Erfisflat Another perfect example for Globetard's, like in this above video, and EVERY other NASA video shows absolutely nothing of reality, but all clear and crisp CGI 3D cartoons. "They" have taken over a trillion dollars, and keep taking billions a month $$$ on the satellites, .. on the Mars Rover, why didn't they use actual images taken from them, instead "They" give us 3D Cartoons, like to Kindergarten children.
Oh yeah a question, .. if the above video is the Planet Mars, why are they planning to send humans there again? To what, .. to hopefully populate Mars because Earth is just unacceptable, .. unbearable as habitat for humans!?
(Sorry for the name "planet earth", that is changing by the day) Here is NASA's terrible, chaotic earth they want to get us off of:
Yuck, terrible isn't it? No wonder NASA wants to get us off it, so they can destroy the rest of it so it be like in
Genesis 1:2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep.
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 75%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.9  
  Sources: 5  
  Relevant (Beta): 64%  
  Learn More About Debra