DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.
No, I’m not sure if they personally collided with Russia against Truml. Although, the Democratic Party May have as a whole colluded with Russia to make sure that Trump wouldn’t win the 2016 presidential election, although, Trump won the 2016 presidential election. I also believe that the investigation into Russia collusion is not needed and a waste of tax payer money.
No, I don’t believe they did. I don’t think that any party colluded with Russia and that includes the Trump administration.
Does that include Hillary and her campaign? They hired Fusion GPS to make up the Trump dossier. Fusion GPS, in turn, hired Russian operatives to come up with the stories in the dossier.
It is possible, although somewhat unlikely. Sanders historically has had strong ties with Soviet Union and later Russia, which saw him as a good destabilizing factor for the US - but given his strong position against Putin and his regime, I do not see him taking Putin's money willingly. As for Stein, she is not a very serious political candidate and only less politically proficient people seriously consider voting for this anti-science conspiracy theorist; pretty sure Putin can find better venues to invest in.
That said, Putin's goal on the 2016 election was probably to prevent a reasonable candidate from winning. In this context, promoting fringe candidates, especially given that they have a potential to take away votes from serious candidates, makes sense. But, again, I am yet to see any evidence of Putin funding Stein or Sanders. Putin funding Trump, on the other hand, is incredibly likely, as he quickly recognized that Trump has a potential of winning, and also as Trump's stance on Russia is the best news that country had had since early Carter's times.
@CYDdharta "Fusion GPS A Washington-based private intelligence firm founded in 2009 by former journalist Glenn Simpson is hired by the Washington Free Beacon, a conservative publication funded by Republicans opposed to Donald Trump, and begins to examine his and his team's relationship with Russia, along with other matters." -2015 Clinton and the DNC just took over the bill once Trump won the nomination.
@CYDdharta "Fusion GPS A Washington-based private intelligence firm founded in 2009 by former journalist Glenn Simpson is hired by the Washington Free Beacon, a conservative publication funded by Republicans opposed to Donald Trump, and begins to examine his and his team's relationship with Russia, along with other matters." -2015 Clinton and the DNC just took over the bill once Trump won the nomination.
Completely false.
All of the work that Fusion GPS provided to the Free Beacon was based on public sources, and none of the work product that the Free Beacon received appears in the Steele dossier. The Free Beacon
had no knowledge of or connection to the Steele dossier, did not pay
for the dossier, and never had contact with, knowledge of, or provided
payment for any work performed by Christopher Steele. Nor did we have
any knowledge of the relationship between Fusion GPS and the Democratic
National Committee, Perkins Coie, and the Clinton campaign.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
  Considerate: 85%  
  Substantial: 88%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.52  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 45%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.48  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 74%  
  Substantial: 36%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.3  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
That said, Putin's goal on the 2016 election was probably to prevent a reasonable candidate from winning. In this context, promoting fringe candidates, especially given that they have a potential to take away votes from serious candidates, makes sense. But, again, I am yet to see any evidence of Putin funding Stein or Sanders. Putin funding Trump, on the other hand, is incredibly likely, as he quickly recognized that Trump has a potential of winning, and also as Trump's stance on Russia is the best news that country had had since early Carter's times.
  Considerate: 85%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.98  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Clinton and the DNC just took over the bill once Trump won the nomination.
  Considerate: 97%  
  Substantial: 64%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.06  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 61%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 63%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.18  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 29%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 17%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.28  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 91%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 36%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 83%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.38  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra