DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.
@AlofRI appeal to the stone") is a logical fallacy that consists in dismissing a statement as absurd, invalid, or incorrect, without giving proof of its absurdity. Ad lapidem statements are fallacious because they fail to address the merits of the claim in dispute.
@AlofRI appeal to the stone") is a logical fallacy that consists in dismissing a statement as absurd, invalid, or incorrect, without giving proof of its absurdity. Ad lapidem statements are fallacious because they fail to address the merits of the claim in dispute.
FYI, also known as an appeal to ridicule. We can however all say things at times that might appear silly to others which put ourselves as subject to ridicule. My advice here should you accept it would be to suck it up, not to take it personally, not to get defensive and make wild accusations.
In regard to your OP it would be great if you could elaborate a bit more.
You say we live inside the earth , tell me is science close to getting any images of what’s it’s like to live outside the earth? Is it possible for humans to live on the outside or is that just a “pipe dream”?......When you put the pipe down get back to me
It seems like your view is just a different interpretation of the observations. There is a geometric transformation that takes a sphere and "inverts" everything, so everything that was inside the sphere moves to its outside, and everything on the outside moves to its inside - but it does not actually change anything from the observer's perspective.
Your model is valid, but it seems less convenient to work with than the traditional one. You have to put all the stars and other objects in the immensely huge Universe into the sphere, while everything outside the sphere is just the Earth's insides, which we will probably not get deep into within our lifetimes anyway.
It seems like your view is just a different interpretation of the observations. There is a geometric transformation that takes a sphere and "inverts" everything, so everything that was inside the sphere moves to its outside, and everything on the outside moves to its inside - but it does not actually change anything from the observer's perspective.
Your model is valid, but it seems less convenient to work with than the traditional one. You have to put all the stars and other objects in the immensely huge Universe into the sphere, while everything outside the sphere is just the Earth's insides, which we will probably not get deep into within our lifetimes anyway.
What sets the concave earth apart from the other models is that we recognize the fact that light bends in the atmosphere constantly.
Aside from the fact that the earth curves up instead of down
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
  Considerate: 66%  
  Substantial: 45%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 68%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.7  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: few of my friends response    nice weekend   joy   smiley  
  Relevant (Beta): 60%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 63%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 83%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.6  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 88%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 63%  
  Substantial: 20%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.5  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: fist bump    fallacy      
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 56%  
  Substantial: 11%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.32  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: illogical arguers         
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
You say we live inside the earth , tell me is science close to getting any images of what’s it’s like to live outside the earth? Is it possible for humans to live on the outside or is that just a “pipe dream”?......When you put the pipe down get back to me
  Considerate: 91%  
  Substantial: 46%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 3.84  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: pipe dream    humans   science   earth  
  Relevant (Beta): 78%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Your model is valid, but it seems less convenient to work with than the traditional one. You have to put all the stars and other objects in the immensely huge Universe into the sphere, while everything outside the sphere is just the Earth's insides, which we will probably not get deep into within our lifetimes anyway.
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.2  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Aside from the fact that the earth curves up instead of down
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra