MGTOW is short for Men Going Their Own Way, and a MGTOW is a man who adheres to the movement by avoiding relationships from either or both bad experiences or the perspective that relationships are disadvantageous to men. The reason that MGTOW's are misguided is because, while abusive potential partners do exist in the world, to extrapolate these things onto the entire female population is a fallacy of hasty generalization, for the existence of undesirable female companions does not mean that all females are unsuitable mates.
Acta deos numquam mortalia fallunt.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
  Considerate: 69%  
  Substantial: 94%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.86  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: radical feminism    men's effort   worthless partners   point of view  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
Well, radical feminism is different from the MGTOW movement because, while there are those in the contemporary feminist movement that have regressive views toward men, the MGTOW movement is uniquely about relationship ills in regard to women whereas modern feminism tackles whole hosts of other issues like workplace equality, social inequality, patriarchal dynamics in culture, female reproductive rights, so on and so forth. Now, I’m not going to go into the merits of these points in this debate as it would be off-topic, but do you at least recognize, whether or not you agree with said points, that ‘radical feminism’ does encompass far more than stigma against men and that this stigma isn’t reflective of the entire movement as a whole?
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
I prefer to be single not because of some bad experiences with the same or the opposite sex, but simply because this lifestyle suits me best. I prefer to be completely free and independent from others. I do not even really form very close friendships with people, because I like to be a sole master of my time and to not have my plans interfered with, unless I am the initiator. I have a lot of goals that involve interaction with large groups of people, and I find it to be a much more interesting and rewarding experience, than spending days, months, years of my life with the same person. I would rather meet with 200 new people in a single day and exchange a few words with each, than spend 10 hours in a group of 3-4 friends.
I also have always been a nomadic person. I cannot sit in one place for long and I need to be on the move constantly. When I am forced to live in one location for years for career reasons, I make up for it by travelling cross-country every couple of months. And I find the time much more enjoyable when it is just me, my car and the map with interesting locations around the country, than when it is a lot of people and I end up too focused on conversations and not on the travel.
Now, do not mistake me for an anti-social person; I am not like that, and I like meeting with people who are dear to me every now and then. I just do not like it to be a part of my everyday life.
Also, the more people I have formed close bonds with in the locale I live in, the harder it is to move on to a new location. Hence, I prefer to not form close attachments and to stay mobile. Mobile lifestyle is much harder to maintain when you have very close friends and a family, than when you are a lone warrior.
People better decide for themselves what works for them, but they have to be honest about it. It is okay to not want to get into romantic relationships, but it is strange to do so in the assumption that the opposite sex is full of liars, gold diggers and so on. We all encounter bad individuals in our lives and sometimes make a mistake giving them too much of our time. In such cases, a smart thing is to take a deep breath and move on. Nobody dies as a result of a failed relationship (unless the relationship has failed in a truly spectacular way), and saying, "She was not what I expected, hence all women are bad" is just an easy way out, as a way to ignore the problem and put it on a bookshelf, never inspecting its root and never learning from the experience.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 73%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: main point    radical feminism   method   ways  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
Indeed, you're entitled to pursue as you wish, socially and romantically speaking.
  Considerate: 83%  
  Substantial: 44%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.48  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
Well, my point wasn't that radical feminism is more hostile than the MGTOW movement, just that it is more complex. Nonetheless, there indeed observable regressive social attitudes that can be found in both, just to varying degrees.
  Considerate: 84%  
  Substantial: 91%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.06  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: observable regressive social attitudes    radical feminism   point   degrees  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
Seeing as we have a dispute about the basic definition of the word, let's go to Wikipedia which if nothing else is good for explaining the basic definitions of different concepts:
Radical feminism doesn't think men are toxic, it thinks the concepts of masculinity and femininity are toxic and there should only be one set of societal expectations which would apply to all people regardless of gender.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 56%  
  Substantial: 22%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.16  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: men    women      
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
That is hardly a valid reason. There are many alternatives that do not involve the hardships of the typical divorce process:
- Marriage-less relationship.
- Marriage with a prenup.
- Marriage with a partner who you have lived with for a long time and whom you trust completely.
- Marriage with a partner from a culture where divorces are strongly frowned upon.
Men who avoid relationships because of the alleged systemic bias against them are not the most logical ones. They are like those women who avoid sex out of fear of being impregnated, when there are so many ways to deal with the issue that do not involve abstinence.  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra