You'll need to watch the video to discover what the acronym LGBTQQIAAPP stands for.
No need for an acronym.
It really stands for social engineering to normalize sexual promiscuity and proclivities of depravity.
.
If the Video won't play for whatever reason here's the live link :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0MGOVKxvW0Yes. Whatever did happen to craft days and puppet shows for kids at the local library?
Are there really more than two genders? Science says not. So, what's REALLY going on with all of this?
The further back we look, the greater forward insight we can have. History speaks.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
.
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 48%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.1  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: social engineering    nbsp   sexual promiscuity   acronym  
  Relevant (Beta): 69%  
  Learn More About Debra
Masculine, feminine, neuter.
Gender has nothing to do with sex, it is a linguistic term which modifies a word, in theory a language can have as many as necessary and a lot of languages have many, such as Tuyuca which has 140. Those who try to push the narrative that there are only 2 genders forget or never realize this, and if they try to complain I challenge them to answer to me which gender a toaster should be.
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 73%  
  Substantial: 88%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.54  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: English language    linguistic term   genders   lot of languages  
  Relevant (Beta): 86%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 87%  
  Substantial: 24%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 2.72  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: neuter    gender   Science   nbsp  
  Relevant (Beta): 91%  
  Learn More About Debra
Nope.
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 86%  
  Substantial: 8%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 50%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.42  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
.
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 27%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 82%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.2  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: genders    reproductive process   nbsp    
  Relevant (Beta): 78%  
  Learn More About Debra
If what you mean is "sex" you are wrong because asexual animals exist.
If you are talking about noun modifiers, then you are still wrong because "neuter" genders exist.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/activist-mommy/
Alt-right propaganda sux.
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 33%  
  Substantial: 62%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 81%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.68  
  Sources: 3  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
.
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 69%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.9  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
.
  Considerate: 82%  
  Substantial: 61%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.5  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
Making some progress here, but guess again on the asexual:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMhix4nr_0g
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 67%  
  Substantial: 29%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.96  
  Sources: 3  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: progress         
  Relevant (Beta): 59%  
  Learn More About Debra
It's all about twisting the norm to the sub-normal, to normalize the weird, the wrong, the depraved, the degenerate, the el sicko, the craven, you name it. Read my lips, ....
I T A I N ' T N O R M A L
.  Considerate: 44%  
  Substantial: 69%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 73%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.32  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 38%  
  Learn More About Debra
Since when do you get to decide what is an isn't normal?
Last I checked you are not in charge. Frankly, marriage is an affront to human nature. What exactly makes marriage normal then?
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 68%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.6  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: human nature    marriage   affront   charge  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
This is really what this argument has slowly and inexorably been leading up to right from the get go, when the argument of "discrimination" was applied to gay marriage. I could never quite work out how gays were ever discriminated against on that one, given that NOT A SINGLE SOLITARY PERSON in society could enter a gay marriage at all. Not even heterosexuals. So where was the discrimination, eh? The biggest scam of all time.
It's simply social engineering to have people believe that they are no longer capable of even assessing the normal and non-normal, like you're trying to argue right now, twisting the sub-normal back onto those of us who A R E normal and trying to kid us that we have no R I G H T to have a concept of N O R M AL. Well, I'm sorry bud, but we actually D O. If you want to pretend that society has no concept of normal social practises then maybe you had better go and live on an island all by your little lonesome, because the reality is that it D O E S. To believe otherwise is just a truckload of inculcated LEFTY, SOCIALIST, MARXIST .....
.
  Considerate: 37%  
  Substantial: 98%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 85%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.64  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
I do not see anything wrong with promiscuity; if anything, humanity could benefit a lot from relaxing its stance on sexuality. People are way too prudish and uptight. No fun allowed; just be dead serious, conform with stone age traditions and wear a robe. Or a burqa, depending on which brand of traditionalists you belong to.
The "more than two genders" stuff is pretty bizarre, but there is no harm from it. If someone wants to believe that they are a third, or an 23476842nd, or an infinite gender, or a multidimensional gender or whatever - it is their right. All people have their quirks, and I certainly have mine, so I am not going to judge others for theirs.
The only thing I make fun of is the pronouns. Whenever I hear the "Ze/Zir" pronouns or other things like this, I always tell the joke I read on Youtube, "I identify as the King of the World, so I will ask you to please refer to me as Your Highness". To be fair though, I have never heard any pronouns but the regular ones in real life; it seems to either be a purely Internet thing, or maybe just a very marginal one.
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 76%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.1  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 20%  
  Learn More About Debra
That's just a nothingburger statement and not addressing the topic. You fail to recognize how Cultural Maxism works. It's a politic of stealth and uses "social creep", a bit like tax bracket creep. It creeps up on society without society noticing. That's its modus operandi. If you go back in time, we only ever had two words to describe all of this crap - bi-sexual and homosexual. There was no need for any long-winded acronym. Then we got the feminist shite, followed closely by "Lesbian". So now we had three words. I was nearly 20 years old before I even knew what a freakin' lesbian was. That's how new to the discourse it is in terms of eons of the age of humankind. They keep adding to the list, one by one, now a ridiculous acronym. That's called social creep and it's all coming from the Marxist school of propaganda. Then you wrote ...
Yeh, well. It's not for any man to judge another, but an absence of societal moral compass has historically seen societies quickly descend into unbridled, undisciplined degeneracy and depraved proclivities destroying themselves. "Fun" doesn't have to be sexually-centred at all. That's a twisted and debauched attitude. "Fun" can be had in multiple ways outside of the bedroom. Are you trying to pretend that straight couples have no sense of humor, no sense of fun, have drab, dreary lives? I don't think so. Ridiculous claims which can never be substantiated, so try again. Besides, it seems to me that you don't understand the true nature of a loving respectful and tender relationship, which is the most fun of all. It doesn't need black leather, studs, whips, kinky toys, back channelling, same sex, multi-party threesomes at all.
At least you have your brain matter sorted in recognizing how bizarre it is, however there is heaps of harm in it, because this crap is being used as a platform to debauch and sink our Western culture into a chaotic, immoral, barbaric, cave man abyss, where everything goes, with no respect for one another, no respect for societal norms, no respect for the family unit, just trash it and destroy it, in other words. Destroy the family unit and you destroy the very foundation of every society and that is the intent with all of this filth. The goal is to ultimately destroy the supremacy of the Western culture. Marxism is a politic of envy, as are both Socialism and Communism, with each manifested in absolute and totally twisted control of the masses. That's their purpose. That's the intent. That's the goal. Wake up.
  Considerate: 47%  
  Substantial: 98%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.84  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
Alright, so then LGBTQ marriage is normal because a majority of people support it and the general populace has instinctively decided it is normal.
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 39%  
  Substantial: 98%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 85%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.18  
  Sources: 6  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
The evidence of the absolute and total inculcation over gay marriage is that around 52% or thereabouts voted in support of gay marriage. That means that 52% of society did not have their wits about them when they were led to believe and to accept without question, the claim that gays were being discriminated against, due to the fact that they could not marry one another. That is 52% of the population were dumbed down unable to think for themselves, joined the Marxist groupthink, UNABLE to realize that there was not a whit of discrimination against gays on that score at all. Why not?
THE BIGGEST SCAM AGAINST DUMB PEOPLE OF ALL TIME. THAT'S HOW INCULCATION WORKS
.
  Considerate: 54%  
  Substantial: 84%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 78%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.94  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 78%  
  Learn More About Debra
The how is it possible that you can have an opinion against it?
Isn't it possible that people came to the conclusion to support or to oppose LGBTQ rights independently?
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 64%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.5  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: opinion    people   conclusion   LGBTQ rights  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
Looking at the vigorous campaign in support of the lie CLAIMING that our marriage law was "discriminatory" answers that question immediately The marriage law
W A S N ' T D I S C R I M I N A T O RY A G A I N S T G A Y S W A S I T ?
S O W H A T D E C E P T I O N L E D P E O P L E T O B E L I E V E T H A T I T W A S ?
T H E D I S H O N E S T G A Y M A R R I A G E L O B B Y I S T G R O U P S
Have you any idea how much funding was injected into that scurrilous campaign to infuence peddle that fabrication? B I L L I O N S. So what vested interests would finance a fringe group? There's your answer.
.
  Considerate: 59%  
  Substantial: 78%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 73%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.26  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 80%  
  Learn More About Debra
This "Cultural Marxism" thing seems to be some sort of conspiracy theory. I am aware of identity politics and its ills, but the LGBT stuff in itself has a very loose connection to it, although the way it is used in politics is different.
Why not have fun outside and inside the bedroom? For that matter, why only bedroom? There are also beaches, public parks, trains, cars, yachts. People should loosen up and stop following ancient rituals all the time.
We do not "need" many things in life. But if you only do things that you need to do, then your life is going to be very pale and monotonous, and the question then arises on what the point of your life is at all. You hardly really live then; you just exist.
I prefer to have a vibrant life, with a lot of unique experiences - laughing at everything in the process. Prudes can live their lives the way they want, but not everyone has to be like them.
Good: chaos is everything! The more ancient traditional institutions are eroded, the more interesting life will become. As it is now, we are entering the age of artificial intelligence and space colonisation, yet we still have some traditions from 8,000 years ago. It is time to spice things up!
  Considerate: 75%  
  Substantial: 81%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.9  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 57%  
  Learn More About Debra
That's just naive, May. The entire "Identity Politic" concept was introduced by the New Left, (the cover name for the politic of Cultural Marxism), in order to buttress and bolster the LGBQT Agenda, followed by the drive for social acceptance of gay marriage - a multi-billion dollar systematic campaign waged over nearly a decade. The whole purpose of the Identity politic is to serve at the altar.of the depraved.
That completely ignores everything I've written. As I said claiming a respectful, loving and tender relationship is not heaps of fun is just a debauched attitude. It's far more fun than a loveless one, more stable and enduring too with a better environment for children to grow up in and be nurtured with natural, biological mothering and parenting. Nothing, absolutely NOTHING equals a mother's love for her children. Then you go into a silly diatribe about fun outside the bedroom. I already pointed out your flawed argument that straight couples are dreary and drab. Now you are agreeing with me. They enjoy those past-times too as I said, so they're not dreary and drab.
Inculcated beyond belif and totally ignorant of history. Why am I not surprised? Cultural Marxism preys upon the ignorant. The knowledgeable just look around and see the flaws in that argument and see the empirial evidence against it, including historical evidence against it. Societies decay, crumble and implode into lawlessness without a moral compass. Go back to school - not the one that has already de-educated you.
  Considerate: 63%  
  Substantial: 81%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.78  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 76%  
  Learn More About Debra
So are homosexuals allowed to marry everywhere then, if you are arguing there is no discrimination?
What about all the funding against it, such as the far-right propaganda video in the OP?
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 66%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.54  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: homosexuals    right propaganda video   discrimination   funding  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
If this ""left" faction is new, then how can you attribute its views to Marxism, when Marxism has been around for nearly a century and a half? That is not new; that is old.
Marxists have been around for a very long time; welcome to the real world.
Then what are you disagreeing with? If for some couple fun can be achieved by non-traditional means, then let them do that, if fun is what you truly care about.
Where did I ever say that societal stability was my goal? I said "chaos", man; chaos. It means everything but stability. Blood War was always meant to be won by Tanar'ri!
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 70%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.04  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
A N D
  Considerate: 56%  
  Substantial: 82%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 68%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.42  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 53%  
  Learn More About Debra
The propaganda is in the OP. (OP = original post)
LET THAT SINK IN...
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 86%  
  Substantial: 22%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: original post    propaganda   OP    
  Relevant (Beta): 85%  
  Learn More About Debra
I've already given that information to you under another topic. It was the result of a group of Marxists getting together at Frankfurt University, following the failure of Classical Marxism, in order to review the reasons for its failure and to revise Marxism, with new goals and via a different route - not based on economics but on cultural and social issues. That's the Liberal left's platform today. They called it either neo-Marxism or Cultural Marxism. It first vented its envy upon Western societies across the board in the early 1960s. I lived through it. We had to put up with slogans like, "comparisons are odious",(dumbing down of the school curricula, removing teacher marking of tests and no segregating of classes into Levels A, B, or C, etc.), also "competition is odious" (paving the way for globalism which eradicates competition in the market place), "free love", (freedom to have multiple partners, sex outside marriage and abolition of marriage - de facto cohabitation), all of that and more including the emergence of the pot-smoking hippies, rampant drug use, the absence of a work ethic, touring the nation in their flower-power vans, with no sense of any obligation to support themselves. The New Left left-wing governments of the day allowed them to go on Social Welfare, etc
I could list a heap more of such cultural so-called "norms" which flooded in from the radical leftist universities, the beginning of the break-down of every traditional discipline in education and life generally. For the first time rampant rioting, boozing, undisciplined sex lives on university campuses became trendy, students sleeping with teachers, too. It shocked the entire Western hemisphere. The "New Left" was their claim, rebellious, disrespectful, dirty and was associated with the "great unwashed" for their long dirty hair, dirty fingernails and bare feet. It was the new agenda, a new policy platform for left wing political parties. A baptism of fire. This platform was engaged right across the Western hemisphere by every democracy's left wing. We suddenly realised that left wing Parties had no control over their policy platform, that it was dictated from higher ups - bought and paid for. Here are some definitions of how the elites water it down.
"In theoretical terms, the New Left’s major contribution was to a process of revision and diversification within Marxism and related doctrines, especially with regard to concepts of class, agency, ideology, and culture." - Enclyclopaedia Brittanica
"Many prominent neo-Marxists, such as Herbert Marcuse and other members of the Frankfurt School, have historically been sociologists and psychologists. Neo-Marxism comes under the broader framework of the New Left. In a sociological sense, neo-Marxism adds Max Weber's broader understanding of social inequality, such as status and power to Marxist philosophy." - Wikipedia
Below is a paragraph from a lecture given by Isaac Deutscher in1967 to students at Berkley.
"It is obvious even to the most casual observer that you call yourselves New Left not because you have a new philosophy, but because you want to be distinguished from the previous generation of Marxists, or Leninists, or Trotskyists; you think, quite rightly, that your elders have done badly and you want to make a new start. This sounds very tidy: new people make a new beginning and call themselves New Left. But in what sense are you the ‘new people'? You are young? Young people can be very old if they start with very old ideas, and surely this is a more important consideration than the age group to which you belong. I suggest that you have, first of all, to define what is the new idea you stand for. In what way are you opposed to your elders, and to which of their ideas are you opposed? If you just announce ‘this is the end of ideology’, you start from their own bankruptcy, and bankruptcy cannot be a starting point.
"It is also obvious that what unites you, the New Left, is really an emotional alienation from, and opposition to, this self-satisfied, complacent, well-fed and yet '' bourgeois society."
  Considerate: 56%  
  Substantial: 80%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.1  
  Sources: 4  
  Relevant (Beta): 33%  
  Learn More About Debra
Something does not add up here; your document refers to a group formed in 1930s, while these state-expansion processes had been happening for two decades before then (Woodrow Wilson started the trend). If it is New Left who are responsible for this, then they must have been formed far before then. And if it is Marxists, then that is what it is, not "New Left" or "neo-Marxists".
For that matter, I do not see what is so Marxist about putting sexual minorities collectively under the LGBT label. We put people in collective groups all the time; you do the same thing when calling people with a certain range of views collectively "New Left". Are you a Marxist too then?
Identity politics is a part of Marxism, but Marxism is not the only ideology where identity politics arises. And further, not any separation of people into groups by their identity is identity politics; treating those groups as meaningful political factions is.
  Considerate: 69%  
  Substantial: 88%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.54  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 91%  
  Learn More About Debra
Philosophies aren't developed overnight. These early formulators had many long arguments and debates over what they believed personally about Classical Marxism's failure, about their own ideas on why, what might be the way to identify the flaws, let alone how to address them, many a disagreement on how their own ideas differed, whether there were any solutions, if there were how should they be applied, what was the purpose of their research and what direction should it take, etc. They argued for decades. New people came and went, others were more influential than others, etc. It took decades for anything to "take shape" with a common core and then a common definition, then a common purpose, goal and methodology of teaching it and finally putting it into practise within a cohesively master-minded platform of indetectable dissemination.
Putting people in boxes and labelling them passively is one thing. Cultural Marxism is not about that. Marxism has always been pro-active and subjective, UNLIKE any other philosophy ever devised. Most philosophies are hands-off, intellectual research, merely delivering a collection of objective observations, arguments and opinion. Marxism has always been about 'CHANGE'. Cultural Marxism targets cultural expressions of a society and weaponzes them against that society in order to alter the value set to change that society, via its central function of "criticl theory". The modus operandi is to empower professional and authoritative opinion, (academia and think tanks), to critique a society's cultural norms and pursuade the populace that these are undesirable, or harmful, or can be "improved" until society abandons them. As it is inculcative, it is an information war.
A classic example is we took two hundred years to arrive at racial freedom for non-whites, delivering to them emancipation, abandoning segregation, manifested in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 only to now find Marxism exercising reverse racism against whites, against the very roots of Western civilization, against those who are typical and representative of it, turning our own society against ourselves, by using Identity Politics. At every possible turn, every opportunity, in every nuance that can be possibly exploited, the Caucasian identity is damned with white "supremacy" to blame, white this, white that, white racist phobia this phobia that, etc. all anti white rhetoric, damning ourselves for everything under the sun, seeking to segregate black from white, race from race, gender from gender, religion from religion, etc. An Agenda of D I V I S I O N, not unity. Chaos not harmony.
That's because Identity Politics always and very deliberately focuses on O U R D I F F E R E N C E S rather than on what we share in common and can build upon. It always lays blame at the feet of the CAUCASIAN, only ever that one class, one type, one demographic, one people, one race, one ethnicity, inculcating everyone to not only hate this majority, but to self-hate, to loathe our history, our own heroes, our very own culture itself, while applauding and lauding minority fringe groups, which are N O T representative of our Western culture. Always advocating for their rights, their needs, for laws which pander to them and take away from the majority.
It's almost mainstream now inside every leftie's head, despite the fact it is all a fiction, made up nonsense, using them as little pawns to destroy their very own lifestyle, culture, society and the privileges their own demographic worked hard to build as a Western society to make all available TO ALL. However, if anyone is under-privileged the only demographic to blame is these white privileged supremacists, to which they themselves belong. All invented by Cultural Marxism, a self-destruction, not from without, but from within by infiltration, inculcation. Divide and conquer and the target implodes, with only itself to blame. Extremely clever, but insidiously evil.
.
  Considerate: 69%  
  Substantial: 81%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.68  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 35%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 46%  
  Substantial: 84%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.92  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: shite clings    obvious empirical evidence   propagandist lie   propaganda  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
The fact that is was against the law for same-sex couples to marry is discrimination, don't you get it? It's not rocket science.
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 62%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.36  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: right wing propaganda    rocket science   obvious.The fact   video  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
If we argue that the Marriage Act was discriminatory then we would also have to argue that prohibiting murder is discriminatory against murderers, or prohibiting rape is discriminatory against rapists, prohibiting paedophilia is discriminatory against paedophiles. The gay argument was simply that we want to break the law and the fact that the law won't allow us to break it is discrimination against us. Don't you get it? It's not rocket science.
.
  Considerate: 56%  
  Substantial: 76%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 76%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.56  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: N A T E D    W A S   nbsp   marriage law  
  Relevant (Beta): 89%  
  Learn More About Debra
It would be more akin to if white people were allowed to murder non-whites but anyone of another race would not be allowed to murder at all.
It is discriminatory because there are some people who want to marry each other but can't because a law prevents it. That is textbook discrimination, there is no denying it.
The Law is discriminatory, your argument is one of the dumbest things I have ever read, even by your standards, you have no argument here whatsoever.
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 38%  
  Substantial: 95%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.28  
  Sources: 1  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: white people    book discrimination   false comparison.It   denying it.The Law  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Yours is the false comparison because we can immediately see that N O T A L L were prohibited from murdering others in your example. Whereby the Marriage Law was not like that at all.
I T P R O H I B I T E D E V E R Y O N E F R O M E N T E R I N G A S A M E - S E X M A R R I A G E. I R E P E A T E V E R Y O N E N O E X C E P T I O N S
YOUR COMPARISON IS THE FALSE EQUIVALENT BECAUSE IT ALLOWS E X C E P T I O N S
Definition of discrimination: To isolate, to single out, to treat differently, because of a difference. How and who was being treated differently or singled out by the marriage law? Answer that.
  Considerate: 52%  
  Substantial: 87%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 82%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.04  
  Sources: 2  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: T E D    N O T   P R O H   nbsp  
  Relevant (Beta): 85%  
  Learn More About Debra
People not being able to enter same sex marriage is the discrimination!
Get it?
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 49%  
  Substantial: 38%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.26  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: sex marriage    People   discrimination   nbsp  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
.
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 40%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.02  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: definition of discrimination    sex marriage   nbsp    
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
So is homosexuality different from heterosexuality?
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 59%  
  Substantial: 25%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: homosexuality    nbsp   heterosexuality    
  Relevant (Beta): 85%  
  Learn More About Debra
1. No single person, no entity, no identity, no demographic, no religion, race, color or creed, not a solitary soul was permitted to enter into a same-sex marriage under the law. It was prohibited for all.
2. In spite of that the gay lobby pretended it was somehow discriminatory against them, because they sought to change that law so that they could legally do what was previously prohibited.
3. The law is confirmed by the Courts, which are not empowered to MAKE NEW LAWS, but entrusted with the sole purpose, role and duty of interpreting and UPHOLDING the law.
4. Legislators have a position of trust also, to not only uphold the law but to introduce new legislation which is sound, practical and which protects the people.
5. The Courts must uphold those laws and do so by referencing P R E C E D E N T L A W which proves E X I S T I N G L A W and hand down rulings according to precedent law.
6. When Legislators introduce and enact a law which S E T S A P R E C E D E N T for all other law which must follow it, they need to be sure that it will not impact upon society in a detrimental manner.
7. Lawmakers in amending The Marriage Act did so on the false premise, upon the false argument that the Marriage Act discriminated against the LGBQT community, ALTHOUGH it did not.
8. Consequently, because it can now be argued that the Marriage Act was discriminatory against E V E R Y S I N G LE demographic, although it was not, then the following precedent at law is automatically set ....
A. That ANY demographic can LAWFULLY plead discrimination, BASED ON PRECEDENT LAW simply because it does not like the current law, regardless that EVERYONE is prohibited from that same activity. Nevertheless it constitutes discrimination against that demographic, simply because the demographic can't indulge in that activity, subsequent to how discrimination has been re-denfined.by the law and on the record in gay marriage law.
B. That immediately means that paedophiles can wail discrimination, that child sex traffickers can wail discrimination, that murderers can wail discrimination, that rapists can wail discrimination, that thieves can wail discrimination, because the definition of D I S C R I M I N I T I O N has been corrupted by the law to mean something which it does not actually mean.
C. The corrupted meaning now attributed to the word "discrimination" under the law, as a consequence of amending the Marriage Act to pander to the desires and wants of the LGBQT brigade, has set the precedent that if we want to break a certain law, although it prohibits everyone from engaging in that action, we can do so through the Courts by arging the precedent law set by the Gay Marriage law and that we can expect to succeed to have our unlawful desires upheld by the law by simply demanding that the law M U S T B E C H A N G E D based on no other reason than precedent law already set in stone by errant Lawmakers. As a result, there is absolutely nothing a bench of Judges can argue in the defence of upholding A N Y law we disagree with. It means that EVERY law is now discriminatory against everyone. Get it?
So what does that mean for society? It means that paedophiles, rapists, murderers, child-sex traffickers, pimps, prostitutes, you name it, can claim the law is discriminatory against them. It means that Muslims can demand that Marriage Law is discriminatory against them and it therefore M U S T B E C H A N G E D to allow them polygamous marriages. Same applies to incestuous marriages. Same applies to bestiality being permitted in marriage. Same applies to any law that any particular demographic does not like, even though that law APPLIES TO EVERYONE.
So what have these lawmakers effectively done? D E S T R O Y E D O U R J U S T I C E S Y S T E M . What is the historically recognized strategy to bring a nation to its knees? Destroy its Justice system and you people laugh at the knowledge and scholarship which is fully aware of the devil in the deep - Cultural Marxism? This odious, evil and sinsiter politic engages "Agents" from within a targeted culture to act against its own culture via the methodology of infiltration and inculcation. The following demographics are recognized agents of Cultural Marxism, already known to "awake" scholarship, investigators, politicians, Churchmen and analysts ....
- The LGBQT lobby
- The feminist lobby
- Identity Politics
- Social Justice Warriors
- Atheism
- Islam
- The False Prophets in the Churches - Using altered Bibles and preaching non-Christian dogma
- The False Prophet in the Anti-Christian Pope Francis
- The Democratic Party of the U.S.A
- The Social Democrat Party of the U.S.A.
- George Soros and his 250 propagandist Internet web sites, think tanks, news media, etc. all under the umbrella of the Open Society Foundation
- The mainstream corporate media
- Establishment Academia
- Establishment science
- Hollywood and the entertainment industry
- Traitors in the Dept. of Justice
- Traitors in the FBI
- Traitors in the Intelligence Community - the CIA and Black Budget Ops and the blanket surveillance of every U.S. citizen by NSA, facilitated by Obama
- Silicon Valley Tech giants - Google, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Amazon, etc. etc.
- CERN
These are but half of the true reflection of the networking of the octopus of Cultural Marxism, the unseen, undeclared politic of stealth and chaos, of division and hatred. It has successfully dismantled our Justice System via the Amendment to the Marriage Act by setting a legal precedent which disempowers legislators, Courts, the DOJ and law enforcement, if ever challenged. Get it?.
  Considerate: 82%  
  Substantial: 86%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.7  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 68%  
  Learn More About Debra
Are Homosexuals different from Heterosexuals or not?
Answer the question!
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 59%  
  Substantial: 35%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 83%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.1  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Homosexuals    Heterosexuals   question   nbsp  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 29%  
  Substantial: 68%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 81%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.3  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Are Red Indians    nbsp   Are Asians   Caucasians  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 6%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 0.74  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
Alright, now lets logic:
Definition of discrimination: To isolate, to single out, to treat differently, because of a difference.
1.) homosexuals are a different group
2.) homosexuals are not allowed to marry under the marriage act
3.) therefore, homosexuals are being treated differently by the marriage act
4.) therefore, the marriage act is discrimination!
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 69%  
  Substantial: 64%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Definition of discrimination    homosexuals   marriage act3   logic  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
I HAVE WATCHED IT DECLINE FROM 36 TO 31, FROM 67 TO 55 AND OTHER SIMILAR REDUCTIONS RUNNING NON-STOP AND CONTINUOUSLY IN THE NUMBER OF VIEWS. THE REDUCTIONS HAVE KNOCKED OUT OVER A 100 VIEWS. WHY IS THIS HAPPENING SO BLATANTLY ONLY IN THIS TOPIC, AARONG? i SUSPECT IT HAS HAPPENED WITH OTHERS BUT NOT SIGNIFICANTLY, BUT I SHALL BE RECORDING AND WATCHING FROM NOW ON.
  Considerate: 85%  
  Substantial: 72%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.62  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: VIEWS COUNTER    SIMILAR REDUCTIONS   NUMBER OF VIEWS   IT DECLINE  
  Relevant (Beta): 72%  
  Learn More About Debra
How about you send him a message instead of complaining about it here?
Also, why do you care? It is just a number and doesn't reflect anything.
If it is a glitch, then you just know that it is low.
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 64%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.1  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: number    message   glitch    
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
You know what? I know why you are complaining.
It is because you have finally realized that you are completely in the wrong here, now you are looking for anything to distract yourself from your new insight.
That's what is happening here, isn't it?
You have finally awoken from your dream, now you realize that everyone who was screaming that everything else is fake news and propaganda were the real agents trying to change the narrative, trying to keep you oblivious and ignorant.
Now maybe you can finally move forward.
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 78%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.66  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: fake news    new insight.That   real agents   dream  
  Relevant (Beta): 90%  
  Learn More About Debra
1.) As are all of those I mentioned in the different demographics representative of different groups, subjected to exactly the same law as Homosexuals. Your statement is stoopid, therefore.
2.) Not true. They are allowed to marry under the Marriage Act, just like everyone else is permitted to on the same basis.
3.) NO they are not being treated differently by the Marriage Act at all. They are being treated the SAME AS EVERYONE ELSE. You conflate the fact that they choose to pretend they are not male and female somehow entitles them to claim they are not included in the Marriage Law. They are because they are males and are allowed to marry females. The fact they keep up a pretence that there are more than two genders and pander to a fake claim is not our problem nor is it a problem for the law. It is THEIR OWN problem which they created for themelves. If we allow that rapists have some mental disorder which must therefore excuse them from the law against rape, does that mean we should pass a law saying they can lawfully rape people? That's your argument.
4. ) Therefore your argument is flawed. Your logic is flawed and you have no idea what the definition of "discrimination" means.
  Considerate: 44%  
  Substantial: 92%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.34  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
"The law prohibiting people from walking past a black person without kneeling to them and saying, 'Long live the African race!', is not discriminating, because NO-ONE is allowed to do that."
Does this make a lot of sense? It is essentially the same type of argument you are making.
When the law specifies a rule guiding interaction between two individuals, then posing any conditions on inherent properties of these individuals is discriminatory. A law in Saudi Arabia prohibiting people of different genders from riding a train in the same cab is discriminatory, for example. Or do you disagree with that as well? Legalised gender segregation is not discriminatory, in your opinion?
  Considerate: 75%  
  Substantial: 87%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.32  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
Homosexuality is a demographic. Homosexuals were not allowed to marry until the marriage act was amended in 2017. And yes, Homosexuals were being treated unfairly by being denied marriage rights,
It's plain as day, you can deny all you want, but that's water under the bridge, because homosexuals can marry, they should be allowed to, most people agree, and you are the only person who thinks your argument holds any water (It doesn't)
You have to contradict yourself in order to claim premise 1 isn't true. Here you are agreeing that homosexuals are a different group:
Now you contradict yourself:
Such double-think, you ought to make your Marxist-overlords proud!
This is so simple to debunk you would have to be mentally deranged not to see the problem. you are literally arguing that "allowed to marry" = "not allowed to marry"
LOL! Sorry buddy, I used YOUR definition of discrimination! You played yourself!
Here is proof:
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 36%  
  Substantial: 91%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.14  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
- What other people can do to the person.
- What two people can do between themselves.
- What three people can do between themselves.
- What other people can do to two people.
And so on. A law stating that it is legal to kill the Welsh people with a longbow after midnight is discriminatory (real law in one of the cities in the UK). A law stating that two people with age difference of over 5 years are not allowed to kiss in public is discriminatory. A law stating that five people cannot play Dungeons and Dragons if they all study at the same university is discriminatory.
Non-discriminatory laws do not make references to the people's attributes and only make references to their actions. A law prohibiting murder is not discriminatory, as it only concerns action and does not concern individual attributes of participants. But a law prohibiting murder of Gypsies specifically would be discriminatory.
  Considerate: 84%  
  Substantial: 90%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.9  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: real law    discriminatory.Non-discriminatory laws   reductionist understanding of discrimination   law  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
Consider this argument:
What? So is it law or isn't it? First you propose a hypothetical law which requires the reverence of the African race, alone, which would be discriminatory, naturally, against all other races. Then you claim it is not discriminatory because the law does not exist. What? May that is gobbledegook. Are you arguing that the law, if it were enacted, would or would not be discriminatroy? If enacted it WOULD BE discriminatroy.
No. It makes absolutely no sense, because I cannot even deduce what the argument is that you are even advancing there. It is confused babble. Then you say ....
There are no "properties" imposed on a single individual, given that every single individual in the human race is either female or male and therefore every individual is permitted to marry. This law is silent on all other cultural nuances. LGBQTs are all also either female or male and entitled to marry anyone of the opposite gender, so there is no discrimination at all. It's their business, alone and no-one else's if they choose not to, but they are not prevented from doing so, therefore there is no discrimination. If we removed the qualifiers of female and male then it would be meaningless. To try to move the definition of marrige to something which is suddenly not a reflection of our Western culture at all, but reflects some other culture which is not Western, then it does not serve the interest of we Western people or our culture, and that is the point.
The Marriage Act has no legalised gender discrimination in it. It includes the two scientifically and biologically known genders of the human race. There are no others. Therefore it includes every human who is a citizen of this nation, so you are peddling a lie to mount a duplicitous argument. Besides, we are not talking about other cultures' practises or their law. We are talking about our Western culture and its law.
But seeing you brought up practises of segregation, then should we allow boys in girls' bathrooms, toilets and lockerooms? Girls in boys' bathrooms, toilets and lockerooms? This is where this is heading. It's precisely what Obama attempted to introduce, he the clandestine Marxist, whose mentor, Frank Marshall, was a Communist. Obama's parents were active registered members of the Communist Party. Evidence of the Cultural Marxist Agenda is everywhere. We only have to look at the Marxists on University campuses, in the teaching fraternity and in the Democratic Party to know where it is all coming from. This is the Agenda to destroy the moral codes, the moral ethos of our culture, to destroy our System of Justice and thereby destroy the global supremacy of our Western culture. Marxism is a politic of envy, weaponizing gender aginst our culture and you buy into it.
.
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 90%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.94  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
But that is what you said: "It is not discrimination, because NO-ONE is allowed to do that". I provided a hypothetical law in which also NO-ONE is allowed to do something. By your prior logic, it is not a discriminatory law. Now you are saying it is. Which is it?
If every individual is permitted to marry, and marriage occurs between two individuals, then, for the absence of discrimination, any two individuals must be permitted to marry. What culture it serves or does not serve is absolutely irrelevant with regards to the terminology question.
You have not answered my question: is legalised gender segregation discriminatory? Is the mentioned Saudi law discriminatory?
  Considerate: 82%  
  Substantial: 86%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
It's actually kind of disappointing because if there is a serious argument here we might never know because he doesn't know it for sure, assuming it even exists.
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 87%  
  Substantial: 59%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.42  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Grafix's arguments    serious argument      
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra