From John Money's 1955 integration of "gender is a social construct" to intersex to Leftist Wokism

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: Reality Perception: A Sane Person To An Insane Society Must Appear Insane

This is the delusion of nomenclature and all his alt accounts. 

Yes. I am onto you, nomenclature. You are a deluded runaway patient of Arkham Asylum as you have probably already submitted yourself to the insanity of wokeism itself instead of having the humanity and heart to stand against it. Your own sanity was in question and you allowed yourself to fall. 

http://www.milwaukeeindependent.com/john-pavlovitz/reality-perception-a-sane-person-to-an-insane-society-must-appear-insane/

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: Reality Perception: A Sane Person To An Insane Society Must Appear Insane

I know what you’re thinking. I know you feel something breaking inside lately; an invisible fracture that only you’re fully aware of.

I know the way you walk away from conversations with people you once relied on for wisdom and clarity and compassion, doubting your own sanity because you no longer recognize those things in them. I know the way you feel internally estranged from the friends, coworkers, family members, and neighbors you used to find affinity with—and you wonder if you’re losing your mind.

I understand how you stare at the perpetual parade of horrible scrolling past you, from the second you wake up prematurely in the early morning until the stretched out nighttime moments you try unsuccessfully to fall asleep—and how you question the grip you have on reality.

I know the disbelief you feel in the presence of loved ones and ministers and leaders who now seem to be speaking some strange foreign tongue that you can’t make any sense of. I hear the nagging question you ask inside your head a few hundred times a day: “Is it me, or has a huge portion of this country lost its mind?”

It isn’t you.

You’re quite fine, and this is of course both good and terrible news—because of what it says about you and about the place you find yourself.

The fact that you see how wrong this all is, means your faculties are intact, your mind is fully right, and your heart is working properly. It’s all confirmation that you still have a soul doing what souls are supposed to do: keeping you deeply human in profoundly inhumane times.

This is why you need to hold tightly to that soul because it is more rare and valuable than ever. It’s why you need to embrace this holy unrest in the center of your belly; because it is the greatest weapon against the present epidemic of apathy. It’s why you can’t allow your right mind to make peace with such abject madness.

If enough time passes, an otherwise healthy person can start to get used to sickness. They can slowly begin to convince themselves that almost any horrifying, toxic, painful, twisted reality is acceptable. Little by little they can gradually allow themselves to acclimate to the nightmare, to come to see it as normal. Either that, or they determine that they’re actually out of their minds and they collapse inside. This is a reminder that this is not at all normal and that you are right to feel this disorientation.

I need you to hear this, friend: You’re okay. You’re not alone and you’re not crazy. You’re also in good company.

Right now there is a massive army of similarly walking wounded sharing this place with you; fellow exhausted souls who realize that none of this makes any sense—people concluding that for their health, they will need to create distance from people they once allowed close proximity. There are millions of good people out here still looking to be the kind of people the world needs; those committed to doing no harm, burdened to bring something decent where it is missing.

There are many of us who see clearly: This President is not well. He is not normal. His behavior and his words and his demeanor are all unhinged, dangerous, and wholly unworthy of his lofty position. We can see that this is a bastardization of humanity, a rebellion against goodness, a mutiny against sanity. We can see that those sanctioning and defending and co-signing it are equally unwell, equally disconnected from anything benevolent, similarly propelled by fear and greed and bitterness.

And that’s why we need to keep resisting it. You need to pushback against the madness that tries to convince you that you’re mad. You need to press on, because in days when hatred is normalized, goodness matters.

In times when truth and news are pliable, truth-tellers are worth more than gold. You’re not upside down right now, friend—a good portion of the world is. But be greatly encouraged.

Loving resistance is a world-turner.

Article by John Pavlovitz

http://www.milwaukeeindependent.com/john-pavlovitz/reality-perception-a-sane-person-to-an-insane-society-must-appear-insane/

I have Mr. Pavovitz to thank for writing this article. He knows of mad deluded individuals such as you, nomeclature, anarchist100, smoothie, luigi7255, joekerr etc. All of you are trying to convince me I am mad when I am in fact not because why? I know how to resist your madness of wokeist fascist neo marxism. You will not get away with it.

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: Truths and Facts are all derived from logical common sense

Without it, society will fall into disarray and insanity. What we have going on right now is called wokeist fascist Neo Marxism. Boys and girls are being brainwashed while also being mutilated into freaks. Women are being assaulted by men dressed up claiming to be women when they are suspiciously not and are very very deluded in the head. Men are being deceived by the same fake women who are actually men. Only the sane men and sane women along with smart boys and girls can combat this. The common sense is to know that trangenderism is indeed harmful and that drag shows are sexualizing our children. Denying this only proves the individual getting offended by what I have said to be deluded and/or brainwashed by the very mainstream woke "political correctness" "peaceful protests". Ever since the time of 1967 to 1968, there have been waves and waves of violence. It was the time of the Manson Family who, led by deluded charles manson convinced everyone to do drugs, have uncontrolled sex, calling it "free love" and encouraged them to be violent, instead of actually living up to their peaceful claims. It is what it is. Charles Manson was never Jesus but he sure did claim he was. He was deluded and all those who still follow him today are either dead or in jail. They are still deluded as they were. The LaBianca and Tate murders occurred because of Manson himself. Now, the radical sexual revolutionaries of 1969 have taken over institutions and are attempting to control our speech using compelling verbal terms such as "homophobia and transphobia" in order to instill fear whenever anyone speaks the truth. However, the good news is, homophobia and transphobia don't exist. Neither does genderfluidity and neither does non binary. Pride parades are harmful and so are drag shows. Logical common sense is needed back into society to indeed push against these waves of insanity. As Ben Shapiro had said, "Political Correctness breeds insanity."

The deluded cults of insanity aka Lgbtpedos, BLM, Antifa and hypocritical man hating feminazis are responsible for all the atrocities going on today in society. Some people are waking up to this. Some choose not to. Some choose to ignore it but are aware because it's hard to ignore. While some just simply join in blindly, allowing themselves to fall into pride, disarray and mental madness. Since it is clear that all these movements are secretly worshiping satan while disguising themselves in sheep's clothing, it is very clear that religious organizations, especially Christ-centered ones are focused on pushing back by preparing to save as many as they can, turning them to Jesus Christ. What the world needs is Jesus. What the world needs is to focus on God. For those who love the things of the world do not have the love of the Father nor of the Son. For whoever denies the Son, denies the Father. For whoever denies the Father, denies the Son. Therefore, the ultimate consequence is; those who deny God and His Son Jesus plus blaspheming against the Holy Ghost will indeed be denied themselves into the Kingdom of God. Morality does come from religion and logical facts does come from science. 

What is the difference between pseudoscience and science? 

Pseudoscience is not factually based science. In fact, it's just based on theories that are disproven and also quite often, harmful and sometimes considered mad science. Lgbtpedos do have a misconception and deluded basis of opinions that they call "their facts". However, factual science has constantly destroyed them and will continue to destroy them on sight. Biology has been proven many times to be factually correct. Anatomy supports the facts that men and women do have many many physical differences. There is no such thing as a transgender brain. Forensic Science is another type of science that proves males and females are the only ones in existence. There is no gender spectrum. These are simply facts once more. 

If offended snowflakes believe this to be delusional, they are deluded themselves. This includes nomenclature, anarchist100 and all the trolls that may be alt accounts because they are simply triggered everytime I prove them wrong.

The classic "no u" reaction is typical from them and this is how I've won these debates constantly as trolls often go off topic and do not care about facts. They deny it and ignore it and then call the sane individual giving those facts/truths insane. 

Oh how the irony hits them right in the face. Every time they try, it backfires.






Pity.

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: I've cracked the code; JoeKerr spells Joker

Trying to hide away again, Joker? Nice try. 

Another ten years in Arkham Asylum will suit you. What have you been up to?

You've gone on a rampage to mess with DebateIsland again? The funniest thing. The world has gone mad and you show up to stir up the insanity even more. What does this prove? That everybody is as deluded as you?!

The good people of earth are starting to wake up and are ready to believe in good again. Long have we been oppressed by the woekist fascist neo marxist radical terrorists. 

I say no more.

Nomenclature

@Dr_Batman

Reality Perception: A Sane Person To An Insane Society Must Appear Insane

The irony of your ignorance amuses me. Since you appear blissfully unaware, the idea being put forward by Pavlovitz in the article you linked came from the socialist Erich Fromm.

Fromm was a member of the same Frankfurt school of thought as Antonio Gramsci, the man you were trying to demonise all day yesterday.

Dr_Batman

Nomenclature said:

@Dr_Batman

Reality Perception: A Sane Person To An Insane Society Must Appear Insane

The irony of your ignorance amuses me. Since you appear blissfully unaware, the idea being put forward by Pavlovitz in the article you linked came from the socialist Erich Fromm.

Truths and Facts are all derived from logical common sense

Without it, society will fall into disarray and insanity. What we have going on right now is called wokeist fascist Neo Marxism. Boys and girls are being brainwashed while also being mutilated into freaks. Women are being assaulted by men dressed up claiming to be women when they are suspiciously not and are very very deluded in the head. Men are being deceived by the same fake women who are actually men. Only the sane men and sane women along with smart boys and girls can combat this. The common sense is to know that trangenderism is indeed harmful and that drag shows are sexualizing our children. Denying this only proves the individual getting offended by what I have said to be deluded and/or brainwashed by the very mainstream woke "political correctness" "peaceful protests". Ever since the time of 1967 to 1968, there have been waves and waves of violence. It was the time of the Manson Family who, led by deluded charles manson convinced everyone to do drugs, have uncontrolled sex, calling it "free love" and encouraged them to be violent, instead of actually living up to their peaceful claims. It is what it is. Charles Manson was never Jesus but he sure did claim he was. He was deluded and all those who still follow him today are either dead or in jail. They are still deluded as they were. The LaBianca and Tate murders occurred because of Manson himself. Now, the radical sexual revolutionaries of 1969 have taken over institutions and are attempting to control our speech using compelling verbal terms such as "homophobia and transphobia" in order to instill fear whenever anyone speaks the truth. However, the good news is, homophobia and transphobia don't exist. Neither does genderfluidity and neither does non binary. Pride parades are harmful and so are drag shows. Logical common sense is needed back into society to indeed push against these waves of insanity. As Ben Shapiro had said, "Political Correctness breeds insanity."

The deluded cults of insanity aka Lgbtpedos, BLM, Antifa and hypocritical man hating feminazis are responsible for all the atrocities going on today in society. Some people are waking up to this. Some choose not to. Some choose to ignore it but are aware because it's hard to ignore. While some just simply join in blindly, allowing themselves to fall into pride, disarray and mental madness. Since it is clear that all these movements are secretly worshiping satan while disguising themselves in sheep's clothing, it is very clear that religious organizations, especially Christ-centered ones are focused on pushing back by preparing to save as many as they can, turning them to Jesus Christ. What the world needs is Jesus. What the world needs is to focus on God. For those who love the things of the world do not have the love of the Father nor of the Son. For whoever denies the Son, denies the Father. For whoever denies the Father, denies the Son. Therefore, the ultimate consequence is; those who deny God and His Son Jesus plus blaspheming against the Holy Ghost will indeed be denied themselves into the Kingdom of God. Morality does come from religion and logical facts does come from science. 

What is the difference between pseudoscience and science? 

Pseudoscience is not factually based science. In fact, it's just based on theories that are disproven and also quite often, harmful and sometimes considered mad science. Lgbtpedos do have a misconception and deluded basis of opinions that they call "their facts". However, factual science has constantly destroyed them and will continue to destroy them on sight. Biology has been proven many times to be factually correct. Anatomy supports the facts that men and women do have many many physical differences. There is no such thing as a transgender brain. Forensic Science is another type of science that proves males and females are the only ones in existence. There is no gender spectrum. These are simply facts once more. 

If offended snowflakes believe this to be delusional, they are deluded themselves. This includes nomenclature, anarchist100 and all the trolls that may be alt accounts because they are simply triggered everytime I prove them wrong.

The classic "no u" reaction is typical from them and this is how I've won these debates constantly as trolls often go off topic and do not care about facts. They deny it and ignore it and then call the sane individual giving those facts/truths insane. 

Oh how the irony hits them right in the face. Every time they try, it backfires.

You have once again proven me right and have stumbled over your own words because you are self destructive, subjective and delusionally toxic.

Nomenclature

@Dr_Batman

What we have going on right now is called wokeist fascist Neo Marxism

You've literally just relied on a Marxist idea to dispute your own insanity you blathering moron. Moreover, fascism is the exact political opposite of Marxism. They are diametrically opposed, objectively incompatible ideologies.

Your rants are made all the more pitiful by the fact that you are a thoroughly ignorant man.

Dr_Batman

Nomenclature said:

@Dr_Batman

Reality Perception: A Sane Person To An Insane Society Must Appear Insane

The irony of your ignorance amuses me. Since you appear blissfully unaware, the idea being put forward by Pavlovitz in the article you linked came from the socialist Erich Fromm.

Fromm was a member of the same Frankfurt school of thought as Antonio Gramsci, the man you were trying to demonise all day yesterday.

The irony is all from you so your arguments are invalidated. You have no facts. Granted, you have proven yourself wrong time and again. Antonio was a mad italian communist scumbag who agreed with another scumbag named Karl Marx. Both were insane and you are insane as well. Seeing as how you defend such a man, you have no common sense. I have evidence to debunk you once more. Since you support both mad men who believed in delusional marxism, you definitely do praise stalin who was responsible for the death of millions in those gulag death camps of his. 

Communism never worked. Marxism never worked. Socialism never worked. Stalin was a mad man too as was hitler. You claim we are the fascists who speak common sense, truths and facts and yet you praise commies? Wow. Typical, coming from a mad man like yourself. 

The big irony is that you've proven to be ironic by saying there is irony in my argument when the fact is the irony is on you because you are the joke of the century; a mad man who agrees with more mad men on cultural marxism, wokeness and insanity. 

You have once again been debunked and silenced. You stand zero chances.

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: Debunking Cultural Marxism and Wokeism Altogether

Communism has never worked. Karl Marx had some ideas but did it work out? Did Stalin put it to good use? Nope. He starved millions!

Better dead then red. Communism has never worked, has not been working well and will never work. Of course, there are the insane wokeists today who claim neo marxism is a good thing. Oh but how deluded they are when they lie about being oppressed and yet they are the oppressors themselves. Such hypocrites building lies upon lies upon lies compelling others to also believe in those deluded lies their "truth". Any further words from nomenclature here is automatically invalidated 100%. 

Continued debunking of toxic marxism will destroy al snowflakes on sight.

Nomenclature

@Dr_Batman

Cool. Keep flapping your ignorant, hate-fuelled gums to your audience of one.

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: Why Marx was wrong?

The bicentennial of Karl Marx’s birth has occasioned a surge of interest in the man’s work, complete with the unveiling of a statue in his hometown of Trier, Germany.

At a celebration of Marxism in Beijing last week, Chinese President Xi Jinping declared that, ‘like a spectacular sunrise, the theory illuminated the path of humanity’s exploration of the law of history, and humanity’s search for [its] own liberation’. He would go on to claim that Marx ‘pointed out the direction, with scientific theory, toward an ideal society with no oppression or exploitation, where every person would enjoy equality and freedom’.

Given that Xi’s words were uttered in ‘Marxist’ China, those in attendance had no choice but to agree with them. Yet, speaking in Trier on the same day, European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker offered a somewhat generous appraisal of his own:

Today he stands for things which is he not responsible for and which he didn’t cause, because many of the things he wrote down were redrafted into the opposite.

It is not entirely clear what Juncker meant by this. Marxism, after all, has inflicted untold misery on tens of millions of people who have been forced to live under regimes waving its banner. For much of the 20th century, 40% of humanity suffered famines, gulags, censorship and other forms of repression at the hands of self-proclaimed Marxists.

In his speech, Juncker seemed to be alluding to the standard counterargument: that communist atrocities throughout the 20th century were due to some sort of distortion of Marx’s thought, for which the man himself can scarcely be held responsible.

Is there anything to this argument? Marx spent most of his life analysing the political economy of the industrialising mid-19th–century West. But his enduring relevance owes more to his ideas for the future, and the implications they would have for society. In considering his legacy, this area of his thought cannot be ignored.

Marx regarded private property as the source of all evil in the emerging capitalist societies of his day. Accordingly, he believed that only by abolishing it could society’s class divisions be healed, and a harmonious future ensured. Under communism, his collaborator Friedrich Engels later claimed, the state itself would become unnecessary and ‘wither away’. These assertions were not made as speculation, but rather as scientific claims about what the future held in store.

But, of course, it was all rubbish, and Marx’s theory of history—dialectical materialism—has since been proved wrong and dangerous in practically every respect. The great 20th-century philosopher Karl Popper, one of Marx’s strongest critics, rightly called him a ‘false prophet’. And, if more evidence were needed, the countries that embraced capitalism in the 20th century went on to become democratic, open and prosperous societies.

By contrast, every regime that has rejected capitalism in the name of Marxism has failed—and not by coincidence or as a result of some unfortunate doctrinal misunderstanding on the part of Marx’s followers. By abolishing private ownership and establishing state control of the economy, one not only deprives society of the entrepreneurship needed to propel it forward; one also abolishes freedom itself.

Because Marxism treats all contradictions in society as the products of a class struggle that will disappear when private property does, dissent after the establishment of communism is impossible. By definition, any challenge to the new order must be an illegitimate remnant of the oppressive order that came before.

Thus, Marxist regimes have in fact been logical extensions of his doctrines. Of course Juncker is right that Marx—who died 34 years before the Russian Revolution—was not responsible for the Gulag, and yet his ideas clearly were.

In his landmark three-volume study Main currents of Marxism, the Polish philosopher Leszek Kołakowski, who became a leading critic of Marxism after having embraced it in his youth, notes that Marx showed almost no interest in people as they actually exist. ‘Marxism takes little or no account of the fact that people are born and die, that they are men and women, young or old, healthy or sick,’ he writes. As such, ‘Evil and suffering, in his eyes, had no meaning except as instruments of liberation; they were purely social facts, not an essential part of the human condition.’

Kołakowski’s insight helps to explain why regimes that have embraced Marx’s mechanical and deterministic doctrine inevitably must turn to totalitarianism when confronting the reality of a complex society. They have not always fully succeeded; but the results have always been tragic.

For his part, Xi views China’s economic development over the past few decades as ‘cast iron proof’ of Marxism’s continued validity. But, if anything, it is exactly the other way around. Remember that it was the China of pure communism that produced the famine and terror of the ‘Great Leap Forward’ and the ‘Cultural Revolution’. Mao’s decision to deprive farmers of their land and entrepreneurs of their firms had predictably disastrous results, and the Communist Party of China (CPC) has since abandoned that doctrinaire approach.

Under Mao’s successor, Deng Xiaoping, the CPC launched China’s great economic ‘opening-up’. After 1978, it began to restore private ownership and permit entrepreneurship, and the results have been nothing short of spectacular.

If China’s development is being held back by anything today, it is the remnants of Marxism that are still visible in inefficient state-owned enterprises and the repression of dissent. China’s centralised single-party system is simply incompatible with a modern and diverse society.

Two hundred years after Marx’s birth, it is certainly wise to reflect on his intellectual legacy. We should do so not in celebration, however, but to inoculate our open societies against the totalitarian temptation that lurks in his false theories.

Article by Carl Bildt is a former prime minister and foreign minister of Sweden. This article is presented in partnership with Project Syndicate © 2018. Image courtesy Ferran Cornellà.

https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/why-marx-was-wrong/

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: Terence Corcoran: Let’s debunk the neo-Marxist degrowth craze

You know the economic policy world has lost a few marbles when a concept far removed from the basic elements of human existence has risen to prominence across the planet. Years in the making, it snaked through the COP27 world climate conference ending today in Egypt, across academic and media zones, and guides the thinking of such activist superstars as Greta Thunberg. The concept is a one-word plan to destroy the world economy: degrowth. The idea has recently been attracting hits in the media. “Degrowth: A dangerous idea or the answer to the world’s biggest crisis?” That’s the headline on a CNN story Tuesday that ultimately waffles its way toward a supportive conclusion based on the words of Kohei Saito, a Japanese philosopher whose book, Capital in the Anthropocene, presents degrowth as a rational Marxist alternative to the economic structures that exist today. Cambridge University Press is set to publish what appears to be an English version of Saito’s work, “Marx in the Anthropocene: Towards the Idea of Degrowth Communism,” described by the publisher as “a wholly novel idea of Marx’s alternative to capitalism that should be adequately characterized as degrowth communism … without repeating the failure of the actually existing socialism of the twentieth century.” As a Financial Times columnist wrote the other day in reference to Saito’s promotion of degrowth in Japan, “Marxism is back for the modern age.” Saito, a 35-year-old ideological wunderkind, says he “discovered how Marx was interested in sustainability and how non-capitalist and pre-capitalist societies are sustainable, because they are realizing the stationary economy, they are not growth-driven.”

But there’s more to degrowth than realizing the dream of a stationary economy (whatever that might look like in reality). The dominant degrowth model tends to envision a world economy in which wealthy developed nations — Europe, Canada, the United States — deliberately reduce their economies to allow developing nations to fill the gap. One of degrowth’s leading promoters is Jason Hickel, an anthropologist at the London School of Economics who views the world’s pursuit of economic growth objectives as oppressive functions of centuries of colonialism. To create a post-colonial world and allow the Global South to escape a climate and econological crisis, “rich nations would need to abandon capitalist growth as an objective and shift to a post-growth, post-capitalist system, where production — and energy use — is organized around meeting human needs rather than around elite accumulation.” Hickel concedes that the Global North will not easily abandon growth, so he proposes a kind of economic war in which the Global South rises up. At any moment, Hickel claims, “the South could cut off this flow of wealth. It is within their power to do so. They did it once before, in the decades after decolonization … They used tariffs and capital controls to protect their markets; they nationalized key resources; they improved labour rights and wages; they built public services and developed national industries.”

Some of these ideas echoed through COP27, where a group of UN experts called on wealthy nations to prepare for $1 trillion in annual transfers to developing nations to offset climate costs. Such transfers might not bring immediate degrowth to the North, but they lay the groundwork.

The specifics of degrowth strategies vary by proponent, including the World Economic Forum, which produces videos and commentaries that suggest the world needs to move toward a different economic structure. According to a recent WEF report, “The solution is essentially to move away from the assumption that growth is good.” It is no coincidence that the founder of the WEF, Klaus Schwab, was one of the early adopters of degrowth ideas when the Club of Rome released its 1972 The Limits to Growth book, a milestone in misleading economic and environmental disinformation. Another description of a degrowthed economy was recently provided by a CNBC analysis that envisioned “reduced inequality through job guarantees, shorter working week, and a universal basic income” — all accomplished while “dramatically” scaling down energy and resource use. Meanwhile, low-income countries should continue to grow their economies in a sustainable way until they reach parity with middle-income nations.

Degrowth theory underpins the activism of Greta Thunberg, whose new publication, The Climate Book, is reportedly a curated collection of the writings of assorted neo-Marxist superstars — from Thomas Piketty to  Naomi Klein — built around Thunberg’s anti-capitalist and anti-growth views. The teen green activist now wants to overthrow “the whole capitalist system” that’s responsible for “imperialism, oppression (and) genocide” and “racist, oppressive extractionism.”

Attacks on degrowth theory are spreading. Wall Street Journal columnist Andy Kessler recently called the concept “deadly” and “crackpot.” Growth, writes Kessler, “is oxygen. Growth is how we afford virus vaccines and cures for cancer … Growth is how we take people out of poverty. Growth lifts all ships, not just oligarchs’ yachts.”

With the corporate world greenwashing itself into backing degrowth, the toughest attacks may come from the pro-growth left. A self-styled communist outfit called the Liberation School last year published a scathing and devastating putdown of degrowth. Degrowth, it said, is “antithetical to Marxism itself.” It is also “anti-modern, anti-technological, and anti-large-scale production and infrastructure.”

Maybe the left and the right can come together to debunk a destructive idea that seems to be on the rise.

https://financialpost.com/opinion/terence-corcoran-debunking-degrowth-craze

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: Exposing The Truth Behind Marxism

At 200, Marx Is Still Wrong

Marxism was never about achieving an egalitarian society. It was about the pursuit of raw power.

Two hundred years ago this month, Karl Marx was born in Trier, Germany, a small town in the western part of the country. To celebrate his bicentennial, the People’s Republic of China donated a larger-than-life statue of the founder of Communism to the city of his birth, which the Trier City Council voted to accept. It goes without saying that this memorialization was controversial, not only because of the devastation caused throughout the world during the twentieth century in the name of Marxism, but also because of the still living memory of Communist rule in East Germany. Henceforth when one thinks of Trier, one should remember Tiananmen Square.

As if the China connection were not sufficiently provocative, the Marx commemoration in Trier included a panegyric delivered in the town’s cathedral by none other than Jean-Claude Juncker, the president of the European Commission and effective head of the European Union. Juncker is hardly known as a deep philosophical thinker and his efforts to present Marx as a “philosopher who thought into the future” were the insipid ramblings of a career Eurocrat. But his very presence at the event became a scandal because he casually dismissed the letters of protest he admitted having received from concerned members of the public in central and eastern Europe—the territories which had suffered most under Communist rule and where the memory of that dictatorship is still very much alive.

In Juncker’s telling, Marx was a mild social democrat. But Juncker failed to explore the implications of what was done in Marx’s name. What was it in Marx’s writings that lent itself to the interpretations—or misinterpretations, according to Juncker—of his Stalinist followers?  There is of course a legitimate tension between judging a work—Marx’s work—on its own merits and judging it based on its impact. But Juncker cannot praise Marx for “thinking into the future” while simultaneously trying to insulate Marx from his own legacy.

As we approach the thirty-year anniversary of the collapse of the Soviet Union, it is astonishing that Marx continues to be a popular figure, and not just among people like Juncker. Of course, there are the dogmatists in the few remaining Communist countries  such as China andCuba,  who continue to cling onto his sclerotic ideas. But there are also, closer to home, intellectuals and academics who purvey versions of Marxism in the humanities departments of many college campuses. Meanwhile outside of the universities, popularized versions of Marx’s ideas circulate among left-wing populists, like those of the “Occupy Wall Street” movement. 

All the more reason to review what was rotten about Marx’s ideas—ideas that gave rise to brutal dictatorships and the killing machines of the gulags.  

If you read nearly any passage in Marx’s oeuvre, it’s hard not to be struck by his sense of absolute certainty. He pronounces statements in an apodictic manner, laying claim to an unquestionable sense of truth, with no opportunity to doubt. He is therefore always on the attack as he decimates opponents with unyielding polemic—and he was a master of polemical style, to be sure. Meanwhile there is no self-reflection, no interrogation of his own views, and no sense that he might possibly be wrong.  

Marx channels a voice of infallibility, making sweeping claims with no margin of error and no exploration of evidence: “All history is the history of class struggle ” begins the Communist Manifesto, which he co-authored with Friedrich Engels. All history? Was there really nothing else than conflicts between different economic groups? For Marx, apparently, there was never any other dimension of human experience worthy of independent consideration: no history of technology, of ideas, of culture, or faith. He comes to this one-dimensional schema by deflating the philosophy of history he had found in his teacher, the German philosopher G.W.F. Hegel. In place of Hegelian complexity, he offered simplistic claims to predict the future in the form of “developmental laws of capitalism.”

Perhaps the kindest judgment on Marx is that he was just one more economist who thought he could predict the future. His delusion about his own predictive capacities is what made Marx so distasteful to a thinker like Friedrich von Hayek, who recognized that humans can get things wrong, so best not to endow any single human with too much power, and certainly not the government. Not so Marx, who claimed direct access to incontrovertible insights into the logic of history. For that reason he could conclude his Manifesto with a series of crushing verdicts on competing radical movements, denounced and condemned, without a shadow of doubt. These concluding diatribes against other socialist currents that dared to differ from Marx’s Communism are perhaps the most symptomatic elements of his work, setting up a pattern of defaming one’s opponents, especially those closest to him. Marx’s Bolshevik heirs would transform  that confidence in condemnation into rationale to send political competitors to their deaths. On the long list of victims of Marxism, companions on the left figured prominently.

While we might associate Marx with politics, in fact he lacked any real appreciation for a political sphere in which one would interact productively with advocates of varying programs.  While for others, politics represents a realm of compromise and negotiation, for Marx, it was really the pursuit of power and the obligation to command. He described the state simply as “the executive committee of the bourgeoisie,” meaning that politics was secondary to the economy. Moreover he promised to abolish the state, and therefore politics, once Communism would eliminate class difference—or so the story went, as the ultimate outcome of Communism would be a libertarian utopia of statelessness. 

Nothing, however, would be further from the truth. In practice, what Communism provided for was the development of a nomenklatura, a new class elite which talked the egalitarian talk while claiming for itself the privilege of dictators. The Communist cadre always knew better than the unenlightened populace, and therefore the cadre would claim the power to impose their views and programs on the rest of society. The real political legacy of Marxism was not the abolition of the state but, on the contrary, the expansion of the state over society, and the elevation of a Marxist elite over the populace. No wonder the East Germans calling for the end of their Communist government in November 1989 chanted, “We are the people,” a people which the Communists, when all is said and done, simply deplored. Marxism was not about achieving an egalitarian society: it was the vehicle through which party activists and thugs could pursue their own will to power. (For this reason, the young radical Max Eastman described the Communist revolutionaries in Russia as “Nietzschean.”)

The Marxist pursuit of power also meant denouncing all religion, which Marx described as an opiate, a drug intended to lull its consumers into passivity and false consciousness, so as to keep them from the truth (his truth). Because Marxism emphasized labor and the primacy of human experience, it could appeal to various twentieth-century philosophers, existentialists among others, who emphasized the problem of alienation. Yet Marxism, which treated all thought in a reductionist manner as an expression of economy, could never shake its own anti-intellectual legacy, famously expressed in Marx’s Eleventh Thesis on Feuerbach: “Philosophers have only interpreted the world, the point however is to change it.” 

Discussion of the meaning of life—interpreting the world—turn out to be of negligible import for Marxists, easily dismissed as only “epiphenomenal.” Marx’s alternative to reflective thought was changing the world, but without any room for the sort of ethical guidance that philosophical thinking might offer: change at all costs, change with no limits. The result was a modernizing fantasy of thorough-going transformation with scant attention to the human costs. As Hannah Arendt showed a century later in her Origins of Totalitarianism, this would lead to systematic violence in “experiments” to fashion a “new man,” no matter how much suffering would ensue. Ultimately, Marx had offered a false alternative: philosophical thinking or changing the world. In fact, what defines the human condition is the ability to engage in both, deep thinking and intentional action, and indeed we should prefer action to be guided by thinking, just as thinking should be informed by the experience of prior action.

The claim of infallibility, the will to political power, and the dismissal of ethical thought: such was the legacy that Karl Marx bequeathed to the Communist movement that once ruled half the world. President Juncker, in his celebration of Marx, recalled none of this, revealing himself to be just one more of Marx’s defenders who still insist on the fantasy of a good Marx motivated by sympathy for the poverty of the workers during the industrial revolution.

But Marx was hardly the only thinker to write about nineteenth century social conditions, and he was surely not the most interesting. A page of Dickens is worth a volume of Das Kapital.  Wherever Marxism dominated working class movements—by suppressing competing reform movements or manipulating unions—blue collar workers fared worse. Had Marx not been appropriated as the ideological figurehead of the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917 in order to justify the dictatorship in Russia, he would be barely remembered today. (A Google N-gram search shows that “Marxism” only takes off as a term after Lenin came to power.) Instead, he has become the symbol of decades of terror.

For those who want to talk about Marx, to erect statues in his memory or to defend him as a philosopher, it is high time to discover some intellectual integrity and face up to the crimes committed in his name. It is wrong to say, as one commonly hears in some circles, that his program of Communism was a good idea, but poorly implemented. On the contrary, it was a bad idea from the start and the brutality that always accompanied it was a consequence of its core character.

https://www.hoover.org/research/200-marx-still-wrong

By denying these universally absolute objective facts, nomenclature has proven to be ironically insane, mentally deluded and a degenerate with a low IQ of negative infinity. 

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: KARL MARX WAS A LOSER WHO NEVER WORKED

KARL MARX WAS A LOSER

WHAT ELSE WOULD YOU CALL A MAN WHO DIDN'T SUPPORT HIS FAMILY?

His wife bore 7 children. Only 3 of those children lived to be adults. The other 4 died young from the effects of living in poverty.

Karl Marx was a 'thinker'. He sat in a chair and thought about what it must be like to be a working man.

Rather than experiencing the world as it was, Marx thought about how he wished it would be.

Though he had never worked, Marx concluded that a working man was selling his soul to his boss.

In particular, Marx thought about the new process of making cotton thread by machine, in a factory. What he concluded is that the owners of the factories became wealthy while the workers made wages barely enough to live on. He did not consider that men were leaving the farms to work in the factories because the pay was steady and there was one day off a week, much better conditions than on the farm.

Marx decided the workers should own the factories. He wrote loftily of the toil of the workers, without seeming to have any understanding of investment in order to construct the factory. Nor did he bother his mind to consider all that goes into managing a factory. He just saw men working and found it so repulsive he decided they should at the least own the factory so as to save their souls.

The fact that Marx never worked in itself makes his 'thinking' suspect, but much worse is how Marx provided for his family.

For most of his adult life, and in particular while his children were young, Karl Marx's main source of income came from his friend, Engels, who periodically sent money to support the family.

Engels, in turn, received his money from - cotton mills! His family were owners of a mill in Manchester, England. Engels himself lived off the workers, and the money he sent to his friend Karl Marx was from the profits of the factory.

Karl Marx lived off the toil of factory workers while bemoaning their fate and 'thinking' of how it ought to be.

Karl Marx was a parasite. What sort of man can watch his children go hungry and bury four of them but refuse to work in order to provide for them? The money he received from Engels was never enough to raise the Marx family out of poverty. Certainly their circumstances were worse than those of the factory workers. And Marx was an educated man. He certainly could have found work had he wanted to.

Marx's philosophy of a worker selling his soul seems to be his own excuse for his negligence toward his wife and children.

Did he think it was better for his children to die than for him to get a job and provide for them?

What's astonishing is that a loser such as Karl Marx is taken seriously, his philosophy touted as the working man's utopia.

Of course, wherever Marxism has been instituted, be it in Cuba, in North Korea, in China, in Russia, the workers have never found themselves better off. In fact, Marxism brings with it famine, starvation, and death.

Marx had no experience in the world, no experience working. His experience seems confined to sitting in a chair 'thinking'. And as he thought he contrived a theory which was no more than his own excuse for not working.

Those people who espouse Marxism as the way the world ought to be are no better than Marx himself. Chances are they too are parasites. They're certainly not people who truly care about others. They just want to do like Marx, live off someone else's toil.

IF YOU SCROLL DOWN JUST A BIT, YOU'LL FIND A PLACE WHERE YOU CAN LEAVE A COMMENT. AS YOU'LL SEE, THE TWO COMMENTS LEFT FOR ME ARE NOT GOOD ONES, BUT I APPROVE EVERY COMMENT AS LONG AS IT'S NOT OBSCENE. I'D LIKE TO KNOW WHAT YOU THINK.

Simply put, Marxism is all about hating on capitalism and capitalism is absolutely correct while Marxism is absolutely trash. I have spoken absolute objective universal facts and truths. Nomenclature will be destroyed on sight and will be put in a mental facility. You have no life, nomenclature. You waste your time on here trolling around saying nonsense. You need your meds and you are seriously a spaz. 

https://discover.hubpages.com/politics/KARL-MARX-WAS-A-LOSER

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: One Man's Utopia Is Another Man's Dystopia

While Karl Marx believed his new found ideologies were a utopia for everyone, not everyone agreed. Turns out, it was a dystopia for everyone, causing the deaths of millions. This is just a simple historical fact. Marxism has never worked. It isn't working and it will never work in the future. Never. 

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: EVIL ORIGINS OF TODAY’S ANTI-AMERICAN INDOCTRINATIONS (March 20th, 2021 by Tom Hatley)

To vividly understand a world view we must seek out its origins.  Upon what is the world view constructed?  The Christian world view is based upon the Bible.  So what is the “bible” of the movements that are deconstructing America today?  Where are they trying to take us?  Why do they hate America?
 
Notice below a post from a pastor friend of mine that helps us to understand the evil source seeking to destroy Christian thinking.  His name is Ronnie Rogers.  
“Robin DiAngelo's best-selling book, White Fragility, is used in schools, corporate, and government sensitivity training to advance so-called Social Justice. White children in schools and white adults in government and businesses are told they are racists and must work at being less white.
In this popular book, DiAngelo never mentions the foundation and source of the Social Justice she is advancing. But, in her scholarly work, Is Everyone Really Equal (which is not for everyone to read), she explicitly traces the basis of what she is teaching to the Frankfurt School, Critical Theory, and Marxists like Herbert Marcuse, Max Horkheimer, and even Karl Marx himself.
The Frankfurt School is where neo-Marxists sought to understand why Marxism failed to spread to other countries. They now believe they know why and seek to implement neo-Marxism through Critical Theory in America and elsewhere. Critical Theory is precisely what DiAngelo and other Critical Race Theorists advocate.
It seems obvious why she does not mention the Marxian origin of her ideas in literature for children and employees. Do we really believe parents and companies want their children and employees to be called racists because they are white and because that is how neo-Marxist say we destroy America? I think not.”

Pastor Rogers has many such insights in his new book: A Corruption of Consequence.
I am ordering a case of these and will be offering them below cost out of the church office.  If you are ready to see how Christians and churches in America have been tricked into advancing Marxism and other wicked teachings, then this is a great read for you.  It will help many to leave their compromised churches and seek out a Bible based, New Testament church.
Pastor Rogers serves with me as part of the steering council of the Conservative Baptist Network.  Our goal it to return the Southern Baptist Convention to believing in the inerrancy and total sufficiency of the Bible.  Our beliefs in God and man come from God’s word, not the Marxist tools of Intersectionality and Critical Race Theory.

https://www.ibcgocenter.com/blog/2021/03/20/evil-origins-of-today-s-anti-american-indoctrinations

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: Wokeist Fascist Neo Marxist Cultists justify the murder of hundreds of millions of people and yet defend communists like Antonio Gramsci and Karl Marx?

It is what it is. There is no excuse to justify the deaths of hundreds of millions of people. But what do the trolls here like Nomenclature do? They justify the deaths of millions without remorse, without self awareness etc. That is what I call pure insanity. 

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: Was Joe Chill a Neo Marxist? Was Joker a psychopathic Neo Marxist? Were the Crime Families of Gotham City, the Falcones and Maronis also Neo Marxists bent on destroying capitalism?

Marxism never worked and I think I do see it in DC Universe with the life of Bruce Wayne and the tragedy of his parents losing their life to a low life thug with a gun. In Gotham City, the Waynes had risen high up and they wanted to help Gotham improve. But what happened on the night of Bruce Wayne's eighth to ninth birthday? They got shot! They got shot by a thug with a gun because that thug most likely was convinced that he was oppressed by the Waynes when this obviously wasn't true. The Waynes had many plans to improve the city, to help the poor especially. But maybe the thug was already a brainwashed Neo Marxist? (This was in the 1920s or so, which is way after the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917) And because the thug was probably a neo marxist, he thought the Waynes were the oppressors and that he was an oppressed victim!! Thus this resulted in Bruce Wayne ending up as an orphan....which then he became the best capitalist state businessman ever! He showed those neo marxists that he is no criminal, that he is no oppressor. The criminals of Gotham though? Perhaps the Crime Families like Don Falcone, Maroni etc are examples of communistic Neo Marxist ideologists? Seems like it. They always oppress but then act like the victims while they extort from the population their money and rob from people of their wealth.

Yep. Bruce is no oppressor in DC Universe. All the Crime Families, Joe Chill and Joker are pretty much Neo Marxists bent on destroying capitalism while extorting from the population of their wealth and sometimes, their innocent lives.

anarchist100

Dr_Batman said:

anarchist100 said:

Dr_Batman said:

anarchist100 said:

Dr_Batman said:

A lady gave the most interesting talk on the history of the UK from the time of the Danish invasion, to Alfred the Great taking back Wessex, to the eventual arrest of a man in the Soviet Union who was writing to a friend about Joseph Stalin. He was brought to Moscow and put in the Gulag after being  accused of founding a violent organization. Doesn't this sound familiar? There was no freedom of speech in the USSR at all. The lady goes on to explain how the mentally healthy individuals were accused of insanity, while the mentally insane were seen as the healthy ones. Nomenclature, you are not sane at all in this situation. You are a neo marxist simp and you are indeed insane as are your "friends". I knew that I wasn't mad at all. I knew I wasn't ever insane for speaking the truth. I am healthy both mentally and physically. 

While you? I cannot say the same. Neither can I say the same about your co-conspirators. Communism never worked. Marxism failed. Socialism also failed. You mad? Stay mad because you will be destroyed in another debate by a group of anti communists. There will be no quarter given at all. 

Stalin is dead and any stalin supporter I see will be facing trial, no parole and the death penalty by imprisonment for life or actual execution by law if necessary.

What does communism have to do with anything? Listen, you can't kill or imprison people based on their views, for one thing it's immoral to kill or imprison people who aren't actually doing anything to harm you, there is no large group of Stalinist in government, a few crazy people supporting Stalin is of almost no consequence, secondly you don't get to violate Freedom of speech, we can't have people going around and deciding what can and can't be expressed, the best ideas are rarely accepted by everyone, and those who would vet what ideas can be shared are at best of times fallible humans, and at the worst of times small minded or straight up evil.

So no, you will not be killing any Stalin supporters. Grow up and live with the fact that there are people who you disagree with, you're not a head of state so you can quit the LARPing, if you kill anyone you will be subject to the law of your country, and then you, may be the one executed.

It is you who needs to grow up and accept the facts and truth. Otherwise, you will receive more backlashes and more punishment on this forum which is overseen by me and by me only. You have rejected the facts and truth because you are brainwashed by the insanity of wokeism. You believe in the lies that wokeist fascists have told you. 

Yet you have the audacity to judge and educate me? Nay. The hypocrite always boasts about everything and yet comes out as an ignorant. That's what you are. An ignorant hypocritical truthphobic snowflake. You go against your own conscience if you even ever had one and keep sliding down the hill of which you cannot climb because you do not hold the facts. You hold toxic opinions and unproven fallacies. 

Seriously, check yourself before you wreck yourself. You have failed once more to bring anything helpful to this debate. I will continue to speak as I want because freedom of speech is allowed. Compelling lies will continually be rejected by me and you, anarchist100, you need professional help for your mental instability. The facts stand right where it is. There are only 2 genders; male and female. Gender and sex are relevant facts. Gender isn't a spectrum. Gender's definition was changed by an insane "psychologist" named John Money who experimented on innocent children, causing two of them; who were twin boys, to commit suicide after they were mutilated against their own will. Their mother and father had zero idea of John Money's real intentions. They really thought John Money was going to help those two young twin brothers but instead, he abused his position, mutilated them and yes, he caused them to fall to depression and eventually, suicide. Allowing madness like this today to continue to immoral, unethical and simply not reasonable. Due to the factual reaction and hostility for anarchist100 to "argue back" with fallacies and lies, he has failed once more to produce any kind of supporting evidence from his side. You are an anarchist, your cause is unjust and your goal is to cause more chaos. You will be exposed repetitively until you are put in jail for life. That's where you deserve. You have no remorse. The only thing you have, is anger and resentment. 

Wokeism is all about that these days so anarchist100 is living up to an Ideology of falsehoods and deceptive delusions.

You will never win the fight because no hell nor evil shall overcome a man who hath his faith built upon the rock of Jesus Christ. 


I have once again, spoken the absolute objective universal truths/facts. 

None of this has anything to do with the fact that you want to murder people you disagree with, do you see what I'm talking about here? No, of course you don't you're not quite clever enough, but none the less I'll do my best to show you, like I said previously, you never address what has actually been said in a debate, you just go off on another rant, it doesn't even have to be on the same subject, you seem to think everyone who disagrees with you on one thing disagrees with you on everything else, you're a loon, I'm not here to debate with you, I know better than to waste my time with people of your mental capacity, I don't care about any of the stuff you rant about, let me repeat it to you boy, I DON'T CARE, that's not what I'm here to bother you about, you little turd.

P.S. don't murder anyone, I would hate to see a child on trial for murder.

Some very invalidated arguments. You do hate people. You hate righteous religious individuals who are factual such as myself. 



The debate has been won by me.


God prevails!

Oh good for you, you won an imaginary debate, in your own mind you certainly beat me at whatever it is that you pretend I'm debating with you about. You're so smart. Who's a clever boy?

Dr_Batman

anarchist100 said:

Dr_Batman said:

anarchist100 said:

Dr_Batman said:

anarchist100 said:

Dr_Batman said:

A lady gave the most interesting talk on the history of the UK from the time of the Danish invasion, to Alfred the Great taking back Wessex, to the eventual arrest of a man in the Soviet Union who was writing to a friend about Joseph Stalin. He was brought to Moscow and put in the Gulag after being  accused of founding a violent organization. Doesn't this sound familiar? There was no freedom of speech in the USSR at all. The lady goes on to explain how the mentally healthy individuals were accused of insanity, while the mentally insane were seen as the healthy ones. Nomenclature, you are not sane at all in this situation. You are a neo marxist simp and you are indeed insane as are your "friends". I knew that I wasn't mad at all. I knew I wasn't ever insane for speaking the truth. I am healthy both mentally and physically. 

While you? I cannot say the same. Neither can I say the same about your co-conspirators. Communism never worked. Marxism failed. Socialism also failed. You mad? Stay mad because you will be destroyed in another debate by a group of anti communists. There will be no quarter given at all. 

Stalin is dead and any stalin supporter I see will be facing trial, no parole and the death penalty by imprisonment for life or actual execution by law if necessary.

What does communism have to do with anything? Listen, you can't kill or imprison people based on their views, for one thing it's immoral to kill or imprison people who aren't actually doing anything to harm you, there is no large group of Stalinist in government, a few crazy people supporting Stalin is of almost no consequence, secondly you don't get to violate Freedom of speech, we can't have people going around and deciding what can and can't be expressed, the best ideas are rarely accepted by everyone, and those who would vet what ideas can be shared are at best of times fallible humans, and at the worst of times small minded or straight up evil.

So no, you will not be killing any Stalin supporters. Grow up and live with the fact that there are people who you disagree with, you're not a head of state so you can quit the LARPing, if you kill anyone you will be subject to the law of your country, and then you, may be the one executed.

It is you who needs to grow up and accept the facts and truth. Otherwise, you will receive more backlashes and more punishment on this forum which is overseen by me and by me only. You have rejected the facts and truth because you are brainwashed by the insanity of wokeism. You believe in the lies that wokeist fascists have told you. 

Yet you have the audacity to judge and educate me? Nay. The hypocrite always boasts about everything and yet comes out as an ignorant. That's what you are. An ignorant hypocritical truthphobic snowflake. You go against your own conscience if you even ever had one and keep sliding down the hill of which you cannot climb because you do not hold the facts. You hold toxic opinions and unproven fallacies. 

Seriously, check yourself before you wreck yourself. You have failed once more to bring anything helpful to this debate. I will continue to speak as I want because freedom of speech is allowed. Compelling lies will continually be rejected by me and you, anarchist100, you need professional help for your mental instability. The facts stand right where it is. There are only 2 genders; male and female. Gender and sex are relevant facts. Gender isn't a spectrum. Gender's definition was changed by an insane "psychologist" named John Money who experimented on innocent children, causing two of them; who were twin boys, to commit suicide after they were mutilated against their own will. Their mother and father had zero idea of John Money's real intentions. They really thought John Money was going to help those two young twin brothers but instead, he abused his position, mutilated them and yes, he caused them to fall to depression and eventually, suicide. Allowing madness like this today to continue to immoral, unethical and simply not reasonable. Due to the factual reaction and hostility for anarchist100 to "argue back" with fallacies and lies, he has failed once more to produce any kind of supporting evidence from his side. You are an anarchist, your cause is unjust and your goal is to cause more chaos. You will be exposed repetitively until you are put in jail for life. That's where you deserve. You have no remorse. The only thing you have, is anger and resentment. 

Wokeism is all about that these days so anarchist100 is living up to an Ideology of falsehoods and deceptive delusions.

You will never win the fight because no hell nor evil shall overcome a man who hath his faith built upon the rock of Jesus Christ. 


I have once again, spoken the absolute objective universal truths/facts. 

None of this has anything to do with the fact that you want to murder people you disagree with, do you see what I'm talking about here? No, of course you don't you're not quite clever enough, but none the less I'll do my best to show you, like I said previously, you never address what has actually been said in a debate, you just go off on another rant, it doesn't even have to be on the same subject, you seem to think everyone who disagrees with you on one thing disagrees with you on everything else, you're a loon, I'm not here to debate with you, I know better than to waste my time with people of your mental capacity, I don't care about any of the stuff you rant about, let me repeat it to you boy, I DON'T CARE, that's not what I'm here to bother you about, you little turd.

P.S. don't murder anyone, I would hate to see a child on trial for murder.

Some very invalidated arguments. You do hate people. You hate righteous religious individuals who are factual such as myself. 



The debate has been won by me.


God prevails!

Oh good for you, you won an imaginary debate, in your own mind you certainly beat me at whatever it is that you pretend I'm debating with you about. You're so smart. Who's a clever boy?

And again, you bring nothing positive nor helpful to this debate. Your arguments are invalidated.

anarchist100

Dr_Batman said:

The irony is all present. As anarchist100 has continuously failed to add productive arguments, he has not only been disqualified but will now be unfortunately treated as a mentally insane patient. 

Time for your meds, anarchist100.  Don't murder anyone btw, your name says it all and you are a suspect. 

While I will continue to kill you with facts/truth. 

Haha, when I say 'kill', I do not mean physically. I mean that the truth actually does kill people sometimes because they are offended due to thin skinned reactions. 

It is called a figure of speech. But for someone who takes things seriously on here, you sure don't since again, you deny the facts and truths that I have posted. 

So in the end, it is you who has proven again, my point, that you are not only delusional, you have lost your common sense.

I don't care, whether you want to kill people or not you're still an absolute loon, the fact that you even use such figures of speech is evidence of such, furthermore you never actually respond to what has been said, you just go off on another rant, oh someone thinks gay rights are a good thing? Well then let's just go talk about why communism is bad, because after all, it really is this simple how people are.

Nomenclature

@anarchist100

Oh good for you, you won an imaginary debate, in your own mind you certainly beat me at whatever it is that you pretend I'm debating with you about. You're so smart. Who's a clever boy?

It's laughable, right? His idea of debate is spamming endless ideological, fanatically religious rants, loaded with mythology, and ignoring anything anybody else says. The imbecile literally belongs in a lunatic asylum.

The_Flash

Argument Topic: Arguments Invalid

Nomenclature said:

@anarchist100

Oh good for you, you won an imaginary debate, in your own mind you certainly beat me at whatever it is that you pretend I'm debating with you about. You're so smart. Who's a clever boy?

It's laughable, right? His idea of debate is spamming endless ideological, fanatically religious rants, loaded with mythology, and ignoring anything anybody else says. The imbecile literally belongs in a lunatic asylum.

You are invalidated.

The_Loremaster

Argument Topic: Trolls be trolling. Nothing productive.

The_Flash said:

Nomenclature said:

@anarchist100

Oh good for you, you won an imaginary debate, in your own mind you certainly beat me at whatever it is that you pretend I'm debating with you about. You're so smart. Who's a clever boy?

It's laughable, right? His idea of debate is spamming endless ideological, fanatically religious rants, loaded with mythology, and ignoring anything anybody else says. The imbecile literally belongs in a lunatic asylum.

You are invalidated.

Agreed. Nomenclature and anarchist100 are laughable trolls indeed. The hypocrisy has been exposed. Dr. Batman, you are the winner here. We are all with you. Your stands with you in unity for the truth, by the truth, with the truth.

Nomenclature

@Dr_Batman

It is what it is. There is no excuse to justify the deaths of hundreds of millions of people.

Yeah, you see your problem here is that capitalism has killed far more people than communism ever did, while it keeps everybody else locked in wage slavery.

You're a dogmatic halfwit who doesn't understand the first thing about Marxism or politics. You are intellectually incapable of having a conversation like a normal human being and have somehow convinced yourself that spamming ultra far right propaganda from trash sites -- while ignoring all criticism and counter arguments -- is how you have a debate.

Get help you weirdo.

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: Nomenclature has no basis of facts. It's laughable and pathetic

Nomenclature said:

@Dr_Batman

It is what it is. There is no excuse to justify the deaths of hundreds of millions of people.

Yeah, you see your problem here is that capitalism has killed far more people than communism ever did, while it keeps everybody else locked in wage slavery.

You're a dogmatic halfwit who doesn't understand the first thing about Marxism or politics. You are intellectually incapable of having a conversation like a normal human being and have somehow convinced yourself that spamming ultra far right propaganda from trash sites, while ignoring all criticism and counter arguments, is how you have a debate.

Get help, you weirdo.

Once again, speak for yourself hypocritical weirdo. 


Tell me, do you ever look in the mirror and think to yourself that maybe you are the problem?



You need to get some serious help. Everytime you tell me to get help, I don't need any. But you sure do and you need to admit it. Or this factual bashing will continue. There is no way I can lose.

It is completely laughable that you have gone nuts by trolling on my forum. So yes, you are a hypocritical weirdo and you deserve no leniency. 


Get serious help now, nomenclature because you have no conscience and I will not be compelled to speak what you want. 

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: The Bash will continue until both anarchist100 and Nomenclature are silenced once and for all

You have no facts. You seriously need help, delusional snowflake. Are you offended because I spoke the truth? Are you seriously that much indenial? 

Cringe on, troll. I can do this all day. But you? You cannot even debate online because you deny the facts. You twist and distort the truth around and throw insults. Haha, t's laughable that you are pathetically driven by your emotions to misjudge. You have no common sense within you.

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: Cultists of Wokeism are harassers of those who speak the truth

It has no doubt already been shown that nomenclature has been trolling this whole time and has failed to produce anything useful. All he can do is insult. Is that what is takes to be a cultist of wokeism? Pathetic is what it is. 


Harassing others for speaking truth and facts seem to be triggering him and anarchist100. All their arguments are invalidated to the core. 

Nomenclature

@Dr_Batman

Tell me, do you ever look in the mirror and think to yourself that maybe you are the problem?

Do you understand that every single poster on this entire website thinks you are clinically mad?

Nobody is interested in your "I know you are, you said you are, but what am I?" responses, you intellectually redundant child. Get off the internet and seek psychiatric help.

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: The Madness of Nomenclature is factual

Calling me weirdo eh? Funny but not factual. It's actually pretty hypocritical for you to defend a mad commie like Antonio Gramsci but avoid all the millions who died for communism. You are indeed insane and you need serious professional help. This truth will continue to tread over you, nomenclature because you have no life. You have no truth. You have no brain. You are a bot and you will be treated as such. By not accepting facts of reality that you actually need professional help, the cops will put you where you belong. As for me, I am an ordinary male citizen living my life. 


It's laughable that you and anarchist100 are conspiracy theorists and you know what? Conspiracy theorists aren't factual. 

So you lose again.

Dr_Batman

Nomenclature said:

@Dr_Batman

Tell me, do you ever look in the mirror and think to yourself that maybe you are the problem?

Do you understand that every single poster on this entire website thinks you are clinically mad?

Nobody is interested in your "I know you are, you said you are, but what am I?" responses, you intellectually redundant child. Get off the internet and seek psychiatric help.

Nobody is interested in you telling lies so your arguments are all invalidated. At this point, anything you say will be disregarded as insanity.

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: The Truth Keeps Marching On

With the discourteous behavior of nomenclature, I do not give a care. I will say what I want on here and that is solely the truths and facts. Those with common sense will surely care. Those who know what's going on out there will surely care. We have a society to protect and nomenclature, like any insane marxist psychopath will not give a care for who dies and who doesn't as long as it isn't him/her. That's what makes all red commies cowards. All they care about is power. Everytime nomenclature types and posts trash, he gets shot down by the truth and only the truth. You need some serious help, nomenclature. You think you are sane? Nah. You have proven otherwise. You are a wokeist fascist neo marxist psychopath who believes everyone who doesn't agree with you to be insane even though you are the one rejecting facts and truths that are indeed important to accept. But instead of doing so, you would just allow millions to die? That makes you a murderer and a criminal. You are indeed a hypocrite, a snowflake, a weirdo and an insane runaway patient. You need to cry me a river and get over it. Grow up and get off this site. Clearly, you can't handle the truth. You can't at all. That is what's laughable. You ignore the facts. That's what makes you a troll. That's what makes you weak. As far as I am concerned, you've been giving nothing but emotional denial and strawman statements that fall apart as soon as you mention "I need professional help". The joke is ultimately on you because your intellectual level has already been showing itself to be below negative infinity. That's just another fact that I will expose about you continuously. You can't handle the facts so get off this site and cry about it. I've got work to do as an adult male here. Let the adults handle debates will you? 

Perhaps you are a twelve year old who can't handle such things? Yeah or maybe you are an adult who can't grow up to be mature enough eh? That's how you are acting. You don't act your age. 

Hate to break it to you. Age isn't fluid. 

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: What trolls like nomenclature need

What trolls need

In order to attack others, trolls need a victim pool and a public forum of some kind, and they usually want an audience.

This means trolls gravitate to anywhere online users interact - like blog sites, social networks, multiplayer games, discussion forums, hobby sites and so on. They are found on sites that primarily target adults like news sites, company sites and forums, and they thrive on sites with lots of kids and teens who may be particularly vulnerable to attack - unless there is a strong moderator that can control their behavior or kick them off a site.

You crave for attention. You crave for a victim to beat on. You have messed with the wrong person online, punk. 

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: The Actual Truth vs Wokeist Lies

The Absolute Universal Objective Truths

At least Jordan defends religious freedom and is against transgenderism because it is harmful, sexist and retarded. Jordan at least stands for common sense against lgbtpedos. That alphabet cult needs to be banned all across the world. They don't own us, they don't own love, they are not God, they are nothing but scumbags. There is no transphobia. We are not irrationally fearful. The alphabet cult is hypocritical, pedophiles etc. There are only 2 genders; male and female. Marriage and true love is between a real man and a real woman. There is no non binary, there is no gender fluid. Non conforming identities need to be banned on sight, it's not normal. Lgbtpedos want to use their own alternative gay conversion therapy to indoctrinate kids. So yeah, it's not normal. There is no gender spectrum. The alphabet cult are truthphobic, Christophobic and heterophobic. Ban pride parades now. The rainbow belongs to God. There is no pansexual. There is no asexual, as asexuality only applies to specific animals. Every man and woman is born heterosexual. To go against that is to go against the natural law of human nature itself. God created man and woman to be together in marriage for the purpose of creating families. Homosexuality and bisexuality etc causes the infection of AIDs/HIV and other STDs and STIs. The stats don't lie about drug abuse and other forms of abuse as well. 

What people believe to be toxic masculinity is the expectations of certain things that make a man who he is:

1. Emotionless

2. Being a jerk

3. Having muscles and working out

4. Being sporty

5. Being strong physically

6. Doesn't cry

7. Has money and has a car

8. Dominant

Although I wouldnt call these things toxic, it's just that it doesn't apply to every man and it doesn't make a man lesser if a man doesn't have one or all of these things to him.  Men do indeed have emotions. Most just don't want to show it. So feminazis are hypocrites when they talk about toxic masculinity. There is toxic feminism too btw. Forcing men to be submissive instead of dominant. etc? Yeah, pure sexist hypocrisy.

"We must harass everyone who plays Hogwarts Legacy"

So lgbtpedos have finally admitted that they are the perpetrators? Hypocrites, snowflakes, heterophobes, truthphobes, Christophobes and retards. All of them are labelled under those categories. Normal people including those who have disabilities do not fall under those categories because they have what it takes to accept common sense and factual basis that universally applies to all. That means men are men. Women are women. Boys are boys. Girls are girls. 

I will buy the game and I will destroy all social injustice villains who approach. All snowflakes will be annihilated and impaled by the truth.

Lgbtpedos will be destroyed by counter-self defensive truth arguments. Yes, lgbtpedos, you will be wiped from exist.

Trans women are not women. Trans men are not men. Men are men. Women are women. 

"Transphobia" doesn't exist.

Lgbtpedos are the assholes and they will be wiped from existence. I am an asshole and I love being heterosexual. In fact, I accept the fact that I am a man and I love being a biological man who supremely has what it takes to date a biological woman, whom is my fiancé.

Act Man on twitter is now my witch hunting target. He is obviously a fan of being debated and destroyed by the truth and only the truth. All who are unreasonably hypocritical will face full annihilation and lecturing of facts facts facts. A full on Blitzkrieg of Truth. Come at me, snowflakes, you are weak and you will be wiped the moment you start something with me. Stay mad because I will fight back and I will crush you until all of you are wiped from existence.

"Ha. I am going to make something very clear to you, you are a man not a woman. You are either a man or a woman as you are born. Biology is absolute. Since you assume we are "transphobic" then you are invalidated in your argument and you will be labelled as a truthphobe, Christophobe and a heterophobe. Except the fact is, transphobia doesn't exist because we are not irrationally fearful of transgenderism itself. We are against it because it is sexist towards men and women. Another fun fact: Men are men. Women are women. Boys are boys. Girls are girls. True love and marriage is exclusively only between a real man and a real woman. That's another fact. Heterosexuality is the only sexuality that brings kids through true love."

Hogwarts Legacy is not transphobic. It is justified. Anymore harassment from the alphabet cult and my response is to call in a full on counter-self defensive aero-truth strike. Don't believe it? You will be bombarded by pure universal facts. All anti social, injustice villains will be impaled by the truth and only the truth. I have spoken absolute objective universal truths. I will buy the game in absolute infinite support of JK Rowling who is factual and correct 100%. All snowflakes will be flat out exposed as hypocrites with mental issues. Cry me a river and get over it.

I am planning to buy it. I will buy it because I am a big Harry Potter fan and nostalgia does return to me. It is a wonderful game. Also, the game is not transphobic. It is a justified game. Men are men. Women are women. I fully support JK Rowling because she is factual. Men are masculine. Women are feminine. That is an absolute truth. Facts are facts. FACTS ARE NOT OPINIONS. Biology is based on FACTS. Got it? BIOLOGY IS BASED ON FACTS!

Trans men are not men, they are women. Trans women are men not women. The lgbtpedo cult can shove their own agenda down their own throats and get kicked in the guts, sending them back to Kingdom Come. 

I will support JK Rowling on the part that she supports biology. I do not support the hypocrites from the lgbtpedo aka the truthphobic, heterophobic, Christophobic and ROWLOPHOBIC snowflakes who shout, whine, tantrumnize and cry about an epically well made game.  

Nomenclature

@Dr_Batman

Nobody is interested in you telling lies 

Nobody is lying. It is a fact. Every single poster on this entire website thinks you are clinically mad. If you don't believe me then open up a poll in the new debate list and we'll see which one of us is lying, you insane halfwit.

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: If People Can't Handle the Truth, then what does that say about their sanity?

If you are compelled to believe in lies instead of the truths and facts just because some loud minorities cry about it being offensive, then you are sucking up to some losers. It's not reasonable to allow yourselves to believe in lies. It is not reasonable to allow that to go far at the expense of others' lives as well especially kids. Simply put, very few will stand for the truth these days because of fear of being fired or being attacked or being harassed online. I am not fearful of this. I am not ashamed to stand as a witness and to constantly speak the truth no matter what.

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: Facts are facts and I am sane because I speak the truth

Nomenclature said:

@Dr_Batman

Nobody is interested in you telling lies 

Nobody is lying. It is a fact. Every single poster on this entire website thinks you are clinically mad. If you don't believe me then open up a poll in the new debate list and we'll see which one of us is lying, you insane halfwit.

Again, you are a hypocrite. That is a FACT and here we have it. What makes you a ? You are a for saying I am insane when I am not insane. You are indeed lying when you say the entire website thinks I am clinically mad. You only have yourself to blame for your delusions. You refuse to admit that you are in the wrong because you are actually in the wrong for throwing these cringy accusations of me being "mad". Haha, there is no evidence to support your subjective claims but there is evidence to support me against you in making the same claims, therefore, your argument has failed to succeed. In other words, I have debunked you over tons of times. If you believe nobody is lying, then why are you getting so cringy about me? YOU ARE A YOURSELF AND YOU ARE TOO MUCH OF A COWARD TO ADMIT IT! 

At least I HAVE INTEGRITY AND HONESTY WITHIN MYSELF AND I AM NOT ASHAMED TO PRESENT MYSELF MOST SOPHISTICATEDLY. 


Calling you out on your hypocrisy and deluded state is the first and foremost thing I will do because you have no truth nor facts within you. The first thing you've done is disturb the peace in my forum. The second thing you've done is prove you are a worthless troll. The third thing you've proven is that you have no productive nature about you nor any maturity nor reasonable rationality. All you do is throw accusations and insults which do in fact backfire towards yourself. Blaming this on me won't solve your own self esteem issues. 


The entire site allows freedom of speech and wokeists like you will never stop me because you are invalidated in every argument so far. Your insults do not affect me one bit but it seems that every time I speak facts, you seem to always twist it around in your own narrative. That's how I know you are a wokeist snowflake. You are offended by the truth and that's why I will tell you, I DO NOT CARE WHAT YOU THROW AT ME BECAUSE IT IS ALL LIES COMING FROM YOUR LIPS!

You know not what you do, truthphobe.

You are a laughable one. A very childish one.

Grow up or get off the internet, permanently or else, I will make this forum a living nightmare for all trolls. Trust me, I am very persuasive because I have facts and truths up my sleeves.

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: Nomenclaure can't handle the truth that he gets so mad, he thinks the whole site is waging war. I'd say he is deluded

Noemnclature has demonstrated one thing; He is a wokeist fascist neo marxist troll who likes to disturb others in their private space. No basis of facts at all from his or her side. The arguments I have posted are all factually based and I will never stop.

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: Fun Fact: Nomenclature can't debate

You produce nothing but fallacies over and over with insults over and over. I'd say you are only proving Einstein to be correct.

“Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.” That witticism—I'll call it “Einstein Insanity”—is usually attributed to Albert Einstein.


As you keep repeating the same mad statements over and over again, it only proves you are insane. You want different results eh? You want me to fall? You want me to cry? You want me to lose? You want me to end myself? 

Speaking the truth and facts does not equal to insanity nor to mistakes. Facts and truths are proven. All the facts and truths I've posted are based from real data based research and professionals who know what they are doing thanks to their sophisticated education. Being an educated student myself, I know what I know and i will not hesitate to speak against the wokeists who want people like me to believe in the lies they say over and over again. 

Yet you claim nobody is lying and you claim the entire site is what? Against me? What kind of delusion is that from your mind? Yeah. It is truly the delusional kind because ONLY YOU SEE IT. Not I. That is another simple fact. 

If you were expecting me to simply walk away from a debate site, then you've proven that you are no debater. You can't debate and you have constantly gone off topic expecting different results. That is what's wrong with you. You've proven Einstein to be correct over and over. 


Never gonna happen. I only expect one result when I speak the truth; To be universally correct because facts are facts. It is proven. I do not expect different results, I do not expect people to listen. I don't care that some don't care because I know some do care. I am also aware that the wokeism is all about compelling others to speak certain lies and to denounce facts and truths even though it never changes what exists as facts/truths such as biological gender/sex being relevant facts and marriage being only between a real man and a real woman as well as gender/sex not being fluid with no spectrum. Wokeism is also built on the lie to make those with common sense to question their sanity. 

This has failed to reach me as I will never allow myself to question my sanity. That's why I am a winner here again and again. However, you, nomenclature, you have questioned your sanity and that's why you are allowing yourself to believe in wokeist lies. 

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: Making the same mistakes is insanity itself

Einstein said that. 

As I have said before. When people speak the truth and facts, there is no mistake. However, the constant mistake I keep seeing you make, nomenclature is jumping to the conclusion that I am insane. There is no evidence to support that. It only comes from your deluded mind which makes you subjective, toxic, immature, degenerative, non productive, hypocritical, truthphobic, Christophobic, heterophobic and Binaryphobic. It's very irrational of you to do so. I will keep calling you out because you are simply wrong. You also don't know a thing about me so your assumptions are based on fallacies and your personal hatred just because deep down, you know I am right. Even if you deny it, you are what you say others are. That's what makes you a hypocrite. You seriously need professional help, not to mention Jesus Christ Himself. 

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: Everyone makes mistakes

I admit. I have made mistakes just as everyone has but does this change the facts I have posted? Nope and this does not prove anything the trolls have posted either because they know nothing. Especially things about me. 

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: "Freedom is the right to be wrong, freedom is not the right to do wrong." - Motto of the Queen's Royal Court

Free will was given to us by God. Each of us have choices. Good choices comes with good results. Bad choices comes with consequences. When people decide to do wrong instead of admitting they are wrong like nomenclature, anarchist100 etc, it is called hubris. They believe they can say whatever they want without even thinking. Is that rational? No. Speaking facts and truths though without expecting more then one result is indeed rational. These days we need common sense to return as our children are endangered because of disgusting ideologies, drag shows that sexualize them and mutilation madness as well as the spread of AIDs/HIV without the spreading of self-awareness about it. Pride parades are indeed harmful and people ignore it. Suspicious activities are rising up from lgbtpedos, BLM, Antifa and feminazis all the same. The hypocrisy is real from the wokeists. They believe that they have the right to do wrong while never admitting they can be wrong. Wow. Such hubris. I see them easily provoked, easily angered, easily driven by their emotions instead of their logical side. 

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: Trolls like nomenclature don't just seek out to hurt others, they do it to feel better about themselves

Insulting me and lying about me certainly does make you feel better doesn't it, nomenclature?

You are just one hideous little who is wicked and hides. Jesus spoke of people like you walking in darkness and not knowing where you go. Tsk tsk tsk. 

You are a troll and you are a laughing stock. The joke's always on you because all your accusations and insults only backfire upon yourself. 

Truly pathetic. 

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: Somebody sure isn't lying in the crowd and fortunately, it ain't me.

As I am someone who constantly speaks the truth and the facts, nomenclature does the opposite. 

If you can't handle the truth, I'd say you are irrationally fearful of the truth which makes you Truthphobic. 

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: Nomenclature may hate the truth, however, the truth doesn't care

You say nobody cares about the truth. Luckily, the feeling is mutual. The truth doesn't care about you either because facts are always above feelings. 

Ben Shapiro has always been correct on that one.

Facts over feelings. Facts do not care about your feelings. 

For you, I believe it has driven you mad to the point of being delusional. You are what you are, nomenclature. This uphill attack from you has failed over dozens of times. Continue at your own peril because I will just defeat you again.

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: Do not be afraid of ignorance, because false knowledge is worse

The funniest thing is, you can only produce false knowledge due to your ignorance, nomenclature. While I have done my research and the facts I speak of are all legitimately scientifically and logically based. Biological facts for instance and using common logical sense to debunk all the lies that you throw at me. I am not afraid of your ignorance and it is quite laughable that you are pathetic as you are ignorant. Your pride and hubris also have been exposed. You should be ashamed and your conscience should be awakened but no. You'd rather dig your grave deeper and deeper. Suit yourself. 

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: True feminism vs modern feminazism

True feminism is for equal opportunity for both the male and female genders. There are only 2. No more. No less. Btw, men are not women. Women are not men. Modern radical feminazis are hypocritical for supporting the toxic transgenderism movement for mutilating boys and girls. It's child abuse. The entire feminazi movement needs to be wiped from existence. Same with lgbtpedos, BLM and Antifa. They have all become neo marxists of the wokeist fascist dystopian cult. The difference between traditional feminism where women were allowed to help men like back in WW2 and voting etc and ofc today's toxic feminazism is that, today's feminazism does not take under consideration of what a real woman is and instead empowers a false woman aka a trans woman aka an actual man playing dress up with very unnatural surgical changes. Feminazism is not preserving the human race, they are not just anti woman and anti man, they are anti human, anti life and anti science and anti logic, heterophobic, truthphobic, binaryphobic and Christophobic. Fat females are unattractive. Queers are disgusting. SJWs are villains who need to be impaled repetitively until they are wiped out from existence. Lgbtpedos, BLM, Antifa and feminazis are all threats to humanity. They are collaborating with one another because they all have one thing in common: They hate those who disagree with their radical agendas of unethical ideologies and disproven insanitarian pseudoscience based philosophical satanical atheistic centered religion of naturalist subjective theories. They reject God and yet they create a counterfeit religion to take over to soothe their needs and to allow immorality to run amok across the globe. It threatens our families and just individuals over all of men, women, boys & girls of all ages. I urge you all, ladies & gentlemen to support it no more. Do not give in. Speak the truth. Use common sense, rise up and take back what belongs to you; Scientific Terms, God's rainbow, the meaning of marriage being between a real man and a real woman, the gender roles of male and female and ofc biology. Men cannot..... Get Pregnant Give Birth Grow breasts nor have a vagina Have periods Cross dress because it's odd and improper Be women Be feminine Be mothers Be wives Women cannot...... Have a pen** nor have much body hair Be men Be masculine Be fathers Be husbands Have facial hair naturally because it is a medical condition which is not normal (All snowflakes who say otherwise are invalidated 100%) Men can..... Be strong Be masculine Work Do hard labor Be husbands Women can...... Get pregnant Give birth Be feminine Be mothers Be wives

I have won this debate. All trolls have been utterly defeated.

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: Exposing Radical Feminazism which connects to wokeism

Modern feminism is feminazism aka misandrism in disguise and also civil war misogynism too. Feminazis these days are unlike the traditional feminists who never hated men and actually helped men as well as helping women become strong like men. Feminazis are responsible for the transgenderism movement. They supported it and then when biological women spoke up, what happens? Those female feminazis of today hate on other women who know transgenderism and trans woman are not legit movements for real women. Trans women are men refusing to be men. Trans men are women refusing to be women. Biology debunks transgenderism entirely. Gender/sex cannot be changed nor altered. Age cannot be changed either. There is no gender spectrum. Feminazism is a cult of hypocrisy and man hate as well as waging a civil war on women aka civil war misogynism. Feminazis are bent on power only. They don't care about anything else and what's more radical is, they are worshiping satan, working with other radical cults such as lgbtpedos, BLM and Antifa who are again, not for human rights but are in fact for anti human rights such as abortion, immoral sexual freedom, racism and more. BLM are racist and so are lgbtpedos. None of these movements are sensible. None of it ever was. They compel you to believe in a lie. That's what it is. Feminazism is part of the modern leftist extremist neo marxist wokeism today.

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: Night Hunter Ending: Twin Sodomite Brothers, who are guilty of incest, homosexuality, rape, kidnapping and murder, drown in water after the ice broke underneath their feet. No cops shot them, they shot at the cops and at the decent people.

That movie is just a demonstration that the insane are out there, targeting the decent people such as citizens including me and other common sensible individuals. Lgbtpedos fit the twin sodomite brothers perfectly well. To speak against this as "homophobia" and "transphobia" will be silenced and countered with heterophobia and truthphobia. I have spoken absolute objective universal truths. 

Dr_Batman

Argument Topic: There is everything wrong with lgbtpedos. Everything.

They are guilty for the following crimes and will be eradicated immediately: 
1. Pedophilia; Holding drag shows in front of underage kids. 
2. Violence; Assaulting men and women who stand up for the truth and screaming for them to be cancelled when they are telling the truth. The truth will be spoken and screaming karens will be shot on sight. Corrupt cops will also be shot on sight. 
3. Hypocrisy; Claiming to be fighting for equality and justice when they are hateful towards Christians, truth speakers and just people with common sense. Detransitioners count for one reason; they have repented but it does not rid of them of their insane past. They claim we are the bigots, the "homophobes" and the "transphobes. However, there is no such thing as homophobia nor transphobia. There is such a thing as truthphobia, Christophobia, binaryphobia, heterophobia,, infantphobia and genderphobia. 
4. Abortion aka Infanticide aka they worship an evil demon of hell called Moloch. Yes, back then in ancient times, evil doers sacrificed their children to Moloch. Is it wrong to do this? Yes. 
5. Neo Nazi and Neo Marxist centered ideologies
6. They are anti human overall
7. They are worshippers of Satan
8. They lie
9. They steal. They have stolen God's rainbow and removed on colour, they have stolen the gender signs and astrology signs, twisting it to their own meaning just as Hitler twisted the Swatiska to his own point of view.
10. They are antisemitic
11. They are racist
12. They hate the police but use them anyway
13. They deny science but claim to be scientific 
14. They are degenerates
15. They are sexist towards men and women because they support insane transgenderism
16. They worship false Christs such as Charles Manson
17. They are all connected towards the Cult of Manson, which goes way back to the 60s and the Sexual Revolution
18. They are in league with mad psychologists and mad scientists such as John Money
19. They dehumanize all of us, claiming Darwinian evolution is real when it's not
20. They indoctrinate our kids and force parents to accept it, even when it is wrong. Parents will not stand for that, therefore all lgbtpedos are guilty of more lies and deceptive, self destructive, unconstructive behavior
21. They are secretly rapists and serial killers, violence isn't displayed because they use self victimization to their advantage. They play the hearts of those who are blindly sentimental and lukewarm.
22. They celebrate pride, don't care about spreading AIDs/HIV and other unnatural things that are harmful to humans while ignoring the veterans who died in war and disrespecting them too.
23. They are drug abusers, mainly heroine, amphetamine etc and are child abusers because they want kids to take hormone blockers. This is a crime towards children and if police refuse to stop lgbtpedos, I will take matters into my own hands to uphold the actual law that protects children from harm. 
24. 60% of homosexuals/bisexuals have 1000 sexual partners per year. While heterosexuals never have that many sexual partners. Polyarmory is unjustified, toxic and it is absolutely a universal lie when people defend it. 

Marriage and true love is only between 1 human biological male and 1 human biological female. Speak against this and it is heterophobia. I reserve the right to continue to destroy lgbtpedos. All will be impaled by the truth. 

All that I have spoken are absolute universally objective truths. All snowflakes will be impaled by the truth. There will be no quarter given. None. At all. 


Matthew 18:5-6 "And whoso shall receive one such little child in my name receiveth me. But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea."

Justified ending in the movie Night Hunter when both twin sodomite brothers, who were guilty of conspiracy, kidnapping, murder, rape and even homosexual incest, drowned in the water when the ice broke beneath their feet. They had it coming and it will be brought upon all of lgbtpedos. My wife to be and I plus our children will live through all of it to see lgbtpedos executed one by one. The insane twins even kidnapped an infant, putting her in a box, nearly killing her. When I see lgbtpedos do this, I will be more than just brutal, your punishment will be full castration or female castration wise, sterilization and full removal of your tongue, eyes, and then your arms and legs will be broken. Let that be a lesson that I will break you because you are all inhumane.