Best Recent Content

• Do you believe Trump has the strength of character to be trusted with the nuclear codes?

  Factfinder

  12:12AM

  Delilah6120 said:

  @MayCaesar
  You´re not someone I care to debate with. I don´t trust you. You sound like a gaslighter and I question YOUR character.  Is this your professional job? It´s psychological abuse. 
  
  
  

  I've found @MayCaesar to provide some of the most well thought out opinions on this site. Gas lighting isn't what he does. That's been my experience.

  

• Do you believe Trump has the strength of character to be trusted with the nuclear codes?

  Factfinder

  12:12AM

  Delilah6120 said:

  @MayCaesar
  You´re not someone I care to debate with. I don´t trust you. You sound like a gaslighter and I question YOUR character.  Is this your professional job? It´s psychological abuse. 
  
  
  

  I've found @MayCaesar to provide some of the most well thought out opinions on this site. Gas lighting isn't what he does. That's been my experience.

  

• Who's more authoritarian, liberals, or conservatives?

  Factfinder

  1:57AM
  @Dreamer
  
  How about the right to be free from viruses?
  
  What agency on earth could possibly offer such a 'right'?

  

• Who's more authoritarian, liberals, or conservatives?

  MichaelElpers

  April 25
  @Dreamer
  
  Your going to use an example of 1 person on 1 issue to make that conclusion?
  
  Also little ironic when the left stance on this issue was essentially to authoritatively force people to take the vaccine.

  

• Do you believe Trump has the strength of character to be trusted with the nuclear codes?

  Delilah6120

  April 25
  @MayCaesar
  You´re not someone I care to debate with. I don´t trust you. You sound like a gaslighter and I question YOUR character.  Is this your professional job? It´s psychological abuse. 
  
  
  

  

• Do you believe Trump has the strength of character to be trusted with the nuclear codes?

  MayCaesar

  April 25

  Delilah6120 said:

  The question posed was: ¨Do you believe Trump has the strength of character to be trusted with the nuclear code¨
  This is not a loaded question. I did not pose this question to trap or manipulate anyone. I am interested in what Americans think.
  
  I asked if you believed he was a narcissist and you replied 
  ´I do not characterize people by labels. If your question is whether I think that Trump has little regard for the well-being of those around him, then yes, it seems likely to me.´ 
  
  You stated that you think Trump has little regard for the well-being of those around him. And you believed it was a narcissistic trait.
  
  My question to you is Do you believe Trump has the strength of character to be trusted with the nuclear code?
  

  Where did I express the belief that it is a narcissistic trait? Please provide the exact quote where I suggested so.
  
  I said earlier that I believed that Trump had a very strong character. Whether it is strong enough to be trusted with the nuclear codes, I do not know, for I do not have a standard in mind for what makes one worth trusting with the nuclear codes. I would not trust myself with the nuclear codes, for simply having the ability to kill millions of people at a whim would affect me in unacceptable ways.

  

• Gay at birth?

  ZeusAres42

  April 25

  MayCaesar said:

  ZeusAres42 said:
  
  This seems pretty much on par with a chapter I recently came back to from the book called "Reason: Book I & II: A Critical Thinking- Reason-and Science-based Approach to Issues That Matter (Dr Bos Critical Thinking Series). 

  
  Without potentially infringing too much on copyright, I will say that there is a bit in this section where the Author says that even if a trait is a certain percentage, that doesn't necessarily mean that when forced upon by environmental factors, the result will be the same percentage of an expression of those genes. 
  
  @MayCaesar
  
  

  This is why I am not a biologist... While in most disciplines there are rules and rare exceptions, in biology exceptions are the rule!
  
  Okay, we know that cells of this type are associated with lung cancer, and we know how to kill those cells off without dealing much damage to the rest of the organism - so, problem solved, right? Oops, those cells are smarter than that, see the treatment coming and diversify, leaving a viable offspring that keeps the tumor developing. No problem, we know pretty well how they diversify, so we can adjust the treatment... Oops, they adjust to the adjustment. Okay, whatever, let us just go full chemo and slaughter them all. What, you say that now the entire angiogenesis mechanism is out of whack? Okay, we can adjust the chemical treatment to make sure it does not happen. Wait, the cancer cells are back? Nooooooooo!
  
  I have deep respect for people who can make any progress with this stuff. If everyone was like me, we would still treat everything with hot herbal teas.

  
  
  lol. I also forgot to add that regarding this bit, the Author also said something along the lines, "There are just some things we cannot definitively conclude and best all we can is just 'We don't know!' 
  
  @MayCaesar

  

• Do you believe Trump has the strength of character to be trusted with the nuclear codes?

  jack

  April 23

  Delilah6120 said:

  Do you believe Trump has the strength of character to be trusted with the nuclear codes?

  Hello Delilah:

  
  

  Uhhh...  Which nuclear codes are you talking about??  The ones in his shower, or the ones he threw on the floor?  Maybe they're the ones he sold to the Saudi's.  I dunno.  He said he LOVES Kim Jon Un.  Maybe he gave them to him..

  
  

  Du*de!

  
  

  excon
  

  

• Gay at birth?

  MayCaesar

  April 25

  ZeusAres42 said:
  
  This seems pretty much on par with a chapter I recently came back to from the book called "Reason: Book I & II: A Critical Thinking- Reason-and Science-based Approach to Issues That Matter (Dr Bos Critical Thinking Series). 

  
  Without potentially infringing too much on copyright, I will say that there is a bit in this section where the Author says that even if a trait is a certain percentage, that doesn't necessarily mean that when forced upon by environmental factors, the result will be the same percentage of an expression of those genes. 
  
  @MayCaesar
  
  

  This is why I am not a biologist... While in most disciplines there are rules and rare exceptions, in biology exceptions are the rule!
  
  Okay, we know that cells of this type are associated with lung cancer, and we know how to kill those cells off without dealing much damage to the rest of the organism - so, problem solved, right? Oops, those cells are smarter than that, see the treatment coming and diversify, leaving a viable offspring that keeps the tumor developing. No problem, we know pretty well how they diversify, so we can adjust the treatment... Oops, they adjust to the adjustment. Okay, whatever, let us just go full chemo and slaughter them all. What, you say that now the entire angiogenesis mechanism is out of whack? Okay, we can adjust the chemical treatment to make sure it does not happen. Wait, the cancer cells are back? Nooooooooo!
  
  I have deep respect for people who can make any progress with this stuff. If everyone was like me, we would still treat everything with hot herbal teas.

  

• "Unfair universe" paradox

  Factfinder

  April 25

  Bogan said:

  @maxx ;    well, we are done.
  
  Checkmate.       Thank you for at least trying to debate.    That puts you head and shoulders above the trolls on this debate site.  

  maxx won debate and dismissed you like the ignorant child you are. And you concede another debate. Wow do you have any brain cells at all? Part of being a racist Bogan means you can't use cognitive abilities even if you had any. Thanks for admitting your many flaws.